Literature DB >> 12014718

Retrospective analysis of missed advanced adenomas on surveillance colonoscopy.

Ihab Shehadeh1, Srilakshmi Rebala, Rakesh Kumar, Ronald J Markert, Chris Barde, N Gopalswamy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Miss rates of large polyp/cancer during colonoscopy are reported from tertiary centers where experts do the colonoscopies. This information is important for determining surveillance intervals for repeat colonoscopy, patient safety, and malpractice issues. We evaluated retrospectively the miss rates of advanced adenomas in the setting of a GI fellowship training where most colonoscopies are done by closely supervised fellows.
METHODS: We reviewed the 235 patients who had at least one repeat colonoscopy after initial polypectomy, between 1992 and 1999, at the Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Advanced adenomas were defined as polyps 10 mm or greater in size with or without a villous component or high-grade dysplasia. Data of missed advanced adenomas on 122 patients who had complete colonoscopy with satisfactory preparation and the excluded patients are reported.
RESULTS: Four advanced adenomas (one had intramucosal cancer) on second colonoscopy and two advanced adenomas on third colonoscopy were missed. The miss rate of advanced adenoma for 232 patients was 1.7%, and the miss rate for the 122 patients with complete colonoscopy and satisfactory colon preparation was 2.5% and 3.3% on second and third repeat colonoscopy, respectively. No cancer was missed.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows an advanced polyp miss rate that is comparable with other studies even in a fellowship training setting. Prospective studies with tandem surveillance colonoscopy are needed to confirm our findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12014718     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05680.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  7 in total

1.  Perspectives of colorectal cancer screening in Germany 2009.

Authors:  Andreas Sieg; Kilian Friedrich
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-15

2.  Capsule endoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Andreas Sieg
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-05-16

3.  Relative rates of missed diagnosis for colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy in 379 patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Catherine T Frenette; Williamson B Strum
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2008-09-13

Review 4.  Cancer Care Ontario Colonoscopy Standards: standards and evidentiary base.

Authors:  L Rabeneck; R B Rumble; J Axler; A Smith; D Armstrong; C Vinden; P Belliveau; K Rhodes; C Zwaal; V Mai; P Dixon
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies.

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Woo Shin Jeong; Hyo-Joon Yang; Soo-Kyung Park; Kyuyong Choi; Dong Il Park
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2017-06-12

6.  Frequency and Characteristics of Interval Colorectal Cancer in Actual Clinical Practice: A KASID Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kyeong Ok Kim; Kyu Chan Huh; Sung Pil Hong; Won Hee Kim; Hyuk Yoon; Sang Wook Kim; Yeon Soo Kim; Jong Ha Park; Jun Lee; Bum Jae Lee; Young Sook Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon capsule endoscopy accuracy for colorectal cancer screening. An alternative during the Covid-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Marianny Sulbaran; Leonardo Bustamante-Lopez; Wanderley Bernardo; Christiano M Sakai; Paulo Sakai; Sergio Nahas; Eduardo G H de Moura
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 1.687

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.