Literature DB >> 12012163

Prism adaptation with delayed visual error signals in the monkey.

Shigeru Kitazawa1, Ping-Bo Yin.   

Abstract

Errors in reaching produced by displacing the visual field with wedge prisms decrease with trials, even when the error is not revealed until the completion of the movement. To examine how much additional delay in visual feed-back the monkey can compensate for, the effects of delaying the visual error signals were studied by presenting the terminal visual images after one of five delays, ranging from 0 to 500 ms. Adaptation was fastest when the delay was 0 or 10 ms, decreased significantly with a delay as small as 50 ms and approached zero when the delay was 500 ms. The size of the after-effect decreased with the delay accordingly. The results indicate that prism adaptation in the monkey critically depends on the availability of visual information within 50 ms of completion of the movement. Comparing the results with those for humans, we suggest that monkey and human share a mechanism of adaptation with a short time window of 50 ms, but the monkey lacks another mechanism of adaptation that allows a visual delay of 500 ms or more in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12012163     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1089-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of error-sensitivity during a prism adaptation task in people with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Reza Shadmehr; Shinya Ohminami; Ryosuke Tsutsumi; Yuichiro Shirota; Takahiro Shimizu; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Yasuo Terao; Shoji Tsuji; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Motoaki Uchimura; Masato Inoue; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Saccadic-like visuomotor adaptation involves little if any perceptual effects.

Authors:  Damien Laurent; Olivier Sillan; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The absence or temporal offset of visual feedback does not influence adaptation to novel movement dynamics.

Authors:  Erin McKenna; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Weiwei Zhou; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Acquisition and generalization of visuomotor transformations by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Rony Paz; Chen Nathan; Thomas Boraud; Hagai Bergman; Eilon Vaadia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Combining modalities with different latencies for optimal motor control.

Authors:  Fredrik Bissmarck; Hiroyuki Nakahara; Kenji Doya; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Delayed feedback during sensorimotor learning selectively disrupts adaptation but not strategy use.

Authors:  Samuel N Brudner; Nikhit Kethidi; Damaris Graeupner; Richard B Ivry; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The effect of visual uncertainty on implicit motor adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Guy Avraham; Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Zixuan Wang; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Illusory Reversal of Causality between Touch and Vision has No Effect on Prism Adaptation Rate.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.