Literature DB >> 12006532

Development and validation of a method for using breast core needle biopsies for gene expression microarray analyses.

Matthew Ellis1, Natalie Davis, Andrew Coop, Minetta Liu, Lisa Schumaker, Richard Y Lee, Rujirutana Srikanchana, Chris G Russell, Baljit Singh, William R Miller, Vered Stearns, Marie Pennanen, Theodore Tsangaris, Ann Gallagher, Aiyi Liu, Alan Zwart, Daniel F Hayes, Marc E Lippman, Yue Wang, Robert Clarke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gene expression microarray technologies have the potential to define molecular profiles that may identify specific phenotypes(diagnosis), establish a patient's expected clinical outcome (prognosis), and indicate the likelihood of a beneficial effect of a specific therapy (prediction). We wished to develop optimal tissue acquisition, processing, and analysis procedures for exploring the gene expression profiles of breast core needle biopsies representing cancer and noncancer tissues. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Human breast cancer xenografts were used to evaluate several processing methods for prospectively collecting adequate amounts of high-quality RNA for gene expression microarray studies. Samples were assessed for the preservation of tissue architecture and the quality and quantity of RNA recovered. An optimized protocol was applied to a small study of core needle breast biopsies from patients, in which we compared the molecular profiles from cancer with those from noncancer biopsies. Gene expression data were obtained using Research Genetics, Inc. Named Genes cDNA microarrays. Data were visualized using simple hierarchical clustering and a novel principal component analysis-based multidimensional scaling. Data dimensionality was reduced by simple statistical approaches. Predictive neural networks were built using a multilayer perceptron and evaluated in an independent data set from snap-frozen mastectomy specimens.
RESULTS: Processing tissue through RNALater preserves tissue architecture when biopsies are washed for 5 min on ice with ice-cold PBS before histopathological analysis. Cell margins are clear, tissue folding and fragmentation are not observed, and integrity of the cores is maintained, allowing optimal pathological interpretation and preservation of important diagnostic information. Adequate concentrations of high-quality RNA are recovered; 51 of 55 biopsies produced a median of 1.34 microg of total RNA (range, 100 ng to 12.60 microg). Snap-freezing or the use of RNALater does not affect RNA recovery or the molecular profiles obtained from biopsies. The neural network predictors accurately discriminate between predominantly cancer and noncancer breast biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: The approaches generated in these studies provide a simple, safe, and effective method for prospectively acquiring and processing breast core needle biopsies for gene expression studies. Gene expression data from these studies can be used to build accurate predictive models that separate different molecular profiles. The data establish the use and effectiveness of these approaches for future prospective studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12006532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  33 in total

1.  Comparing the use of Affymetrix to spotted oligonucleotide microarrays using two retinal pigment epithelium cell lines.

Authors:  Anna T Rogojina; William E Orr; Bong K Song; Eldon E Geisert
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 2.  Functional genomics and proteomics: application in neurosciences.

Authors:  K E Wilson; M M Ryan; J E Prime; D P Pashby; P R Orange; G O'Beirne; J G Whateley; S Bahn; C M Morris
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Prognostic gene expression signatures can be measured in tissues collected in RNAlater preservative.

Authors:  Dondapati Chowdary; Jessica Lathrop; Joanne Skelton; Kathleen Curtin; Thomas Briggs; Yi Zhang; Jack Yu; Yixin Wang; Abhijit Mazumder
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Molecular profiling of thin-prep FNA samples in assisting clinical management of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Petriella; Domenico Galetta; Vincenza Rubini; Eufemia Savino; Angelo Paradiso; Giovanni Simone; Stefania Tommasi
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 5.  Beyond laser microdissection technology: follow the yellow brick road for cancer research.

Authors:  Luc G Legres; Anne Janin; Christophe Masselon; Philippe Bertheau
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Maintaining Breast Cancer Specimen Integrity and Individual or Simultaneous Extraction of Quality DNA, RNA, and Proteins from Allprotect-Stabilized and Nonstabilized Tissue Samples.

Authors:  Blanaid C Mee; Paul Carroll; Simona Donatello; Elizabeth Connolly; Mairead Griffin; Barbara Dunne; Louise Burke; Richard Flavin; Hala Rizkalla; Ciara Ryan; Brian Hayes; Charles D'Adhemar; Niamh Banville; Nazia Faheem; Cian Muldoon; Eoin F Gaffney
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Tumor acquisition for biomarker research in lung cancer.

Authors:  Marvaretta Stevenson; Jared Christensen; Debra Shoemaker; Traci Foster; William T Barry; Betty C Tong; Momen Wahidi; Scott Shofer; Michael Datto; Geoffrey Ginsburg; Jeffrey Crawford; Thomas D'Amico; Neal Ready
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Microarray gene expression profiling using core biopsies of renal neoplasia.

Authors:  Craig G Rogers; Jonathon A Ditlev; Min-Han Tan; Jun Sugimura; Chao-Nan Qian; Jeff Cooper; Brian Lane; Michael A Jewett; Richard J Kahnoski; Eric J Kort; Bin T Teh
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  Feasibility of image-guided transthoracic core-needle biopsy in the BATTLE lung trial.

Authors:  Alda L Tam; Edward S Kim; J Jack Lee; Joe E Ensor; Marshall E Hicks; Ximing Tang; George R Blumenschein; Christine M Alden; Jeremy J Erasmus; Anne Tsao; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong; Ignacio I Wistuba; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  The use of artificial neural networks in prediction of congenital CMV outcome from sequence data.

Authors:  Ravit Arav-Boger; Yuval S Boger; Charles B Foster; Zvi Boger
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.