Literature DB >> 12004171

An electromyographic study of low-velocity rear-end impacts.

Shrawan Kumar1, Yogesh Narayan, Tyler Amell.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental analysis was performed to determine the effects of low-velocity rear-end impacts on phasic and magnitudinal activity of the cervical muscles in expected and unexpected conditions.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the phasic response of the cervical muscles to increasing low-velocity rear-end impacts, and to compare the quantitative effects of awareness and unawareness of impending impact. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature contains little information on the etiology of whiplash injuries. Animal and cadaver studies have yielded some insight into the phenomenon. However, in vivo studies of the cervical muscular response and head-neck kinematics to low-velocity impacts are rare.
METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers were subjected to rear-end impacts of 4.9, 8.8, 10.8, and 13.7 m/s2 acceleration at two levels of expectation: expected and unexpected. Bilateral electromyograms of the sternocleidomastoids, trapezii, and splenii capitis were recorded. Triaxial accelerometers recorded the acceleration of the chair, torso at the shoulder level, and head of the participant.
RESULTS: At an acceleration of 13.7 m/s2, the sternocleidomastoids generated up to 179% of their maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram, whereas the splenii and trapezii did not exceed 35% of their maximal voluntary contraction in most of the experimental conditions. Electromyographic variables were significantly affected by the levels of acceleration and expectation (P < 0.001). The onset time and peak electromyogram time for the sternocleidomastoid progressively decreased with increasing levels of acceleration. The kinetic variables and the electromyographic variables regressed significantly on the acceleration (P < 0.01), explaining from 96% to 100% of the variability.
CONCLUSIONS: Muscle responses were greater with higher levels of acceleration. Because the muscular component of the head-neck complex plays a central role in the abatement of higher acceleration levels, it may be a primary site of injury in the whiplash phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12004171     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200205150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Spinal canal narrowing during simulated frontal impact.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Adam M Pearson; S Elena Gimenez; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation.

Authors:  P C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; S Ito; P A Cripton; J L Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The role of sternocleidomastoid muscle in simulated low velocity rear-end impacts.

Authors:  Ivonne A Hernández; Ken R Fyfe; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervical muscle response to trunk flexion in whiplash-type lateral impacts.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Robert Ferrari; Yogesh Narayan; Edgar R Vieira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Head and neck control varies with perturbation acceleration but not jerk: implications for whiplash injuries.

Authors:  Gunter P Siegmund; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Startle responses elicited by whiplash perturbations.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Blouin; J Timothy Inglis; Gunter P Siegmund
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Cervical muscle response to whiplash-type right anterolateral impacts.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Robert Ferrari; Yogesh Narayan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  The role of myofascial trigger points in musculoskeletal pain syndromes of the head and neck.

Authors:  César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; David Simons; Maria Luz Cuadrado; Juan Pareja
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2007-10

9.  Analysis of right anterolateral impacts: the effect of trunk flexion on the cervical muscle whiplash response.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Robert Ferrari; Yogesh Narayan; Edgar Vieira
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Analysis of right anterolateral impacts: the effect of head rotation on the cervical muscle whiplash response.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Robert Ferrari; Yogesh Narayan
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.