Literature DB >> 11999867

The stereoscopic anisotropy: individual differences and underlying mechanisms.

Paul B Hibbard1, Mark F Bradshaw, Keith Langley, Brian J Rogers.   

Abstract

Observers are more sensitive to variations in the depth of stereoscopic surfaces in a vertical than in a horizontal direction; however, there are large individual differences in this anisotropy. The authors measured discrimination thresholds for surfaces slanted about a vertical axis or inclined about a horizontal axis for 50 observers. Orientation and spatial frequency discrimination thresholds were also measured. For most observers, thresholds were lower for inclination than for slant and lower for orientation than for spatial frequency. There was a positive correlation between the 2 anisotropies, resulting from positive correlations between (a) orientation and inclination thresholds and (b) spatial frequency and slant thresholds. These results support the notion that surface inclination and slant perception is in part limited by the sensitivity of orientation and spatial frequency mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999867     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

2.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Similar mechanisms underlie the detection of horizontal and vertical disparity corrugations.

Authors:  Nirel Witz; Jiawei Zhou; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Depth perception not found in human observers for static or dynamic anti-correlated random dot stereograms.

Authors:  Paul B Hibbard; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; Emma C Haigh; Melanie Adrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Stereoscopic Anisotropy Develops During Childhood.

Authors:  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; William Herbert; Laura Villa-Laso; Michael Widdall; Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Auditory compensation for head rotation is incomplete.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; John F Culling; Michael A Akeroyd; W Owen Brimijoin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Stereo slant discrimination of planar 3D surfaces: Frontoparallel versus planar matching.

Authors:  Can Oluk; Kathryn Bonnen; Johannes Burge; Lawrence K Cormack; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Assessment of depth perception with a comprehensive disparity defined letter test: A pilot study.

Authors:  Wei Hau Lew; Daniel R Coates
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  When illusions merge.

Authors:  Aline F Cretenoud; Gregory Francis; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Orientation-specific learning of the prior assumption for 3D slant perception.

Authors:  Shuichiro Taya; Masayuki Sato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.