Literature DB >> 11999153

Do progressing myopes show reduced accommodative responses?

Mark Rosenfield1, Roshni Desai, Joan K Portello.   

Abstract

Refractive error and accommodative responsivity were monitored at 4-month intervals over a 1-year period to determine whether an increased lag of accommodation either precedes or accompanies the development of myopia. Accommodation was measured for stimulus levels of 2.5, 3, 4, and 5 D, and both the slope of the stimulus-response function and accommodative error were computed. Almost all subjects exhibited accommodative stimulus-response gradients close to unity, although a lower gradient was observed in subjects who were myopic upon entry into the study and whose ametropia remained stable. These stable myopes also exhibited the largest lag of accommodation. These findings do not support the proposal that the development of myopia in young adults is accompanied by a reduced accommodative response during nearwork.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999153     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200204000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  16 in total

1.  Accommodation in emmetropic and myopic young adults wearing bifocal soft contact lenses.

Authors:  Janice Tarrant; Holly Severson; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Analysis of changes in crystalline lens thickness and its refractive power after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Hai-Ke Guo; Jing Zeng; Hai-Ying Jin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Optical treatment strategies to slow myopia progression: effects of the visual extent of the optical treatment zone.

Authors:  Earl L Smith
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Accommodative lag and juvenile-onset myopia progression in children wearing refractive correction.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Peripheral defocus and myopia progression in myopic children randomly assigned to wear single vision and progressive addition lenses.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Christopher D Barr; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Study of Theories about Myopia Progression (STAMP) design and baseline data.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Accommodative lag by autorefraction and two dynamic retinoscopy methods.

Authors:  Ruth E Manny; Danielle L Chandler; Mitchelle M Scheiman; Jane E Gwiazda; Susan A Cotter; Donald F Everett; Jonathan M Holmes; Leslie G Hyman; Marjean T Kulp; Don W Lyon; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Noelle Matta; B Michele Melia; Thomas T Norton; Michael X Repka; David I Silbert; Erik M Weissberg
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Binocular dynamics of accommodation, convergence, and pupil size in myopes.

Authors:  Vahid Pourreza Ghoushchi; Juan Mompeán; Pedro M Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Accommodation and induced myopia in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Nicole Quinn; Kayla Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.