Literature DB >> 11997863

[Do tissue marker clips after sonographically or stereotactically guided breast biopsy improve follow-up of small breast lesions and localisation of breast cancer after chemotherapy?].

R Schulz-Wendtland1, S H Heywang-Köbrunner, U Aichinger, S Krämer, E Wenkel, W Bautz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We wanted to determine if tissue marker clips after sonographically or stereotactically guided breast biopsy improve the follow-up of small breast lesions classified BI-RADS 4/5 and the localisation of breast cancer (TNM stage 2 or 3) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective analysis was performed of 108 breast lesions 1 cm or smaller mammographically classified as BI-RADS 4/5 and 14 breast lesions larger than 2 cm mammographically classified as BI-RADS 5. 33 of the 108 breast lesions 1 cm or smaller underwent sonographic core cut breast biopsy (group 1) and 75 stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (group 2). All 14 lesions greater than 2 cm were stereotactically vacuum-assisted breast biopsied (group 3). The centre of the lesion was marked by a clip after the biopsy. Mammographies were performed in all patients of group 1 and 2 with a histologically benign finding (n = 31, n = 69, respectively) and in all patients of group 3 directly after clip placement and after 6 and 12 months. Clip localisation and possible divergence from the original position were verified by a grid.
RESULTS: Two patients of group 1 and 6 patients of group 2 had breast conservative surgery (BET) because of the histological diagnosis of a ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer. The tissue marker clips of the remaining 31 patients of group 1 and 69 patients of group 2 diverged with a mean value of 0.4 cm (standard deviation +/- 0.23 cm; range 0.1 cm to 0.9 cm) from their placement position after 6 months. After 12 months the marker clips deviated with a mean value of 0.4 cm (standard deviation +/- 0.21 cm; range 0.1 cm to 0.9 cm) in 94 patients and 0.8 cm (standard deviation +/- 0.25 cm; range 0.1 cm to 0.9 cm) in 6 patients from their original location. No tumour progression of the benign lesions in group 1 and 2 was diagnosed in follow-up mammograms. In all patients of group 3 the tissue marker clips were the only possibility to localize the tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as all other diagnostic methods showed inconsistent results.
CONCLUSION: Positioning a tissue marker clip in the tumour centre seems to be reasonable after interventional biopsy of breast lesions of 1.0 cm or smaller and before neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997863     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-28278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  8 in total

1.  [O-twist marker for post-interventional marking in imaging of suspected breast lesions].

Authors:  H Sittek; N Heske; M Kessler; S Britsch; C Vick; M Untch; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Comparison of Sonography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Locate Intramammary Marker Clips.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; D L Wachter; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger; B Brehm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Evaluation of a Marker Clip System in Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Cancer Localization Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; M R Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M G Schrauder; M W Beckmann; M Uder; B Brehm; C R Loehberg
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Evaluation of a Wireless Localization System for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions - Feasibility and Cost-effectiveness in Everyday Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Patrik Pöschke; Julius Emons; Felix Heindl; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Sebastian Jud; Ramona Erber; Carolin C Hack; Caroline Preuss; Annika Behrens
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Evaluation of Newly Adapted Clip Marker System in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Suspicion of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger; B Brehm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Using a New Marker Clip System in Breast Cancer: Tumark Vision® Clip - Feasibility Testing in Everyday Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Anna Marlene Rüland; Friederike Hagemann; Mattea Reinisch; Johannes Holtschmidt; Aylin Kümmel; Christine Dittmer-Grabowski; Frank Stöblen; Horst Rotthaus; Volker Dreesmann; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Sherko Kümmel
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  A comprehensive evaluation of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted Mammotome(R) system for ultrasound-guided diagnostic biopsy and selective excision of breast lesions.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 8.  Pathologic Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Cheol Keun Park; Woo-Hee Jung; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2016-04-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.