Literature DB >> 11997692

Neuronal tissue polarization induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?

Martin Sommer1, Nicolas Lang, Frithjof Tergau, Walter Paulus.   

Abstract

In a blinded cross-over design, 10 healthy controls received 900 monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimuli over the primary motor cortex. Stimulation frequency was 1 Hz, and stimulation intensity 90% of the individual resting motor threshold. Suprathreshold stimuli applied at 0.1 Hz before and after repetitive stimulation controlled for changes in corticospinal excitability. We found a lasting corticospinal inhibition that was significantly more pronounced after monophasic than after biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (motor evoked potential amplitude reduced by 35 +/- 20% vs 12 +/- 37%, mean+/- s.d.). We propose that the current flow in the coil plays a significant role in optimising after effects, and asymmetric current flow may be particularly efficient in building up tissue polarization.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997692     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200205070-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  22 in total

1.  Orientation-specific fast rTMS maximizes corticospinal inhibition and facilitation.

Authors:  Tobias Tings; Nicolas Lang; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A transcranial magnetic stimulator inducing near-rectangular pulses with controllable pulse width (cTMS).

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Reza Jalinous; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Tibialis anterior stretch reflex in early stance is suppressed by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Abraham T Zuur; Mark S Christensen; Thomas Sinkjaer; Michael J Grey; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Motor demand-dependent improvement in accuracy following low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of left motor cortex.

Authors:  Cathrin M Buetefisch; Benjamin Hines; Linda Shuster; Paola Pergami; Adam Mathes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 6.  Quadripulse stimulation (QPS).

Authors:  Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Bruce Luber; Courtney A Crowell; Susan A Hilbig; Wesley Lim; Duy Nguyen; Nicolas A Chrapliwy; Simon W Davis; Roberto Cabeza; Sarah H Lisanby; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Enhancement of Neuromodulation with Novel Pulse Shapes Generated by Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Adrian G Guggisberg; Philipp J Koch; Friedhelm C Hummel; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.