Literature DB >> 11996465

Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

P Flamen1, E Van Cutsem, A Lerut, J P Cambier, K Haustermans, G Bormans, P De Leyn, D Van Raemdonck, W De Wever, N Ectors, A Maes, L Mortelmans.   

Abstract

AIMS: This prospective study was designed to determine the utility of 18F-labelled deoxyglucose (FDG) in positron emission tomography (PET) (FDG-PET) for assessing the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in locally advanced oesophageal tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (clinical T4 stage) without organ metastases, underwent FDG-PET before and 1 month after CRT. Patients were classified as major responders by serial FDG-PET when the post-CRT PET demonstrated a strong reduction of FDG uptake at the primary tumour site (>80% reduction of tumour-to-liver uptake ratio) without any abnormal FDG uptake elsewhere in the body. PET response was compared with histology obtained during post-induction transthoracic oesophagectomy.
RESULTS: A strong correlation was found between the extent of lymph node (LN) involvement as shown by the pre-CRT PET and the major response rate (P = 0.001): such response occurred in nine of 11 N0M0 patients (82%), in three of nine N(1-2)M0 patients (33%) and in two of 16 patients (13%) with distant lymphatic spread. Such a correlation was not found for computed tomography or endoscopic ultrasonography. The sensitivity of serial FDG-PET for a major CRT response was 10 of 14 (71%), its specificity 18 of 22 (82%). The concordance between the response assessment by PET and histopathology was 78%. The median survival time after CRT of PET major responders compared with PET non-major responders was 16.3 months and 6.4 months, respectively. The metabolic response as measured by serial FDG-PET is a stronger prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.002) than the extent of LN involvement seen on the pretreatment FDG-PET (P = 0.087).
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that CRT response as assessed by serial FDG-PET is strongly correlated with pathological response and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11996465     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  85 in total

1.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

2.  Positron emission tomography's changing significance in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15

3.  The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tracy Klayton; Tianyu Li; Jian Q Yu; Lanea Keller; Jonathan Cheng; Steven J Cohen; Neal J Meropol; Walter Scott; Meng Xu-Welliver; Andre Konski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

4.  [Neoadjuvant therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  F Lordick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  [18F-FDG-PET in therapy response of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  H A Wieder; K Herrmann; K Ott; B J Krause
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Early restaging whole-body (18)F-FDG PET during induction chemotherapy predicts clinical outcome in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ruoh-Fang Yen; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Lai-Lei Ting; Kai-Yuan Tzen; Mei-Hsiu Pan; Ruey-Long Hong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Staging with PET and the "Will Rogers" effect: redefining prognosis and survival in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  The role of positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Gary Y Yang; Timothy D Wagner; Blair A Jobe; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01

9.  The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eugene Y Chang; Xin Li; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Ryan A Priest; C Kristian Enestvedt; Jingang Xu; Charles S Springer; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  State-of-the-art molecular imaging in esophageal cancer management: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Jolinta Lin; Seth Kligerman; Rakhi Goel; Payam Sajedi; Mohan Suntharalingam; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.