PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET in monitoring therapeutic effect during induction chemotherapy (IC) and in predicting prognosis in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Fifty patients who had histologically proven, locoregionally advanced NPC without distant metastasis and had received IC were recruited in this study. The study cohort consisted of 19 females and 31 males (age 17-72 years, mean 45.9+/-11.9). Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET was performed in each patient after completion of one (33 patients) or two (17 patients) courses of IC. Each patient was restaged on the basis of the (18)F-FDG PET results. Patients who were downstaged to stage I or II were classified as major responders; the rest were classified as non-major responders. RESULTS: Only 1 of the 23 major responders subsequently developed local recurrence. At the time of data analysis, all major responders were alive; by contrast, of the 27 non-major responders, 15 had locoregional recurrence or distant metastasis and nine had died (seven of NPC and two of treatment-related complications). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival in major responders (56.4+/-9.2 and 58.1+/-2.2 months) as compared with non-major responders (33.7+/-23.2 and 44.7+/-20.0 months), with p<0.0001 and p=0.0024, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that early restaging by a single whole-body (18)F-FDG PET scan after the first or second course of IC is useful for predicting therapeutic response and outcome in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET in monitoring therapeutic effect during induction chemotherapy (IC) and in predicting prognosis in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Fifty patients who had histologically proven, locoregionally advanced NPC without distant metastasis and had received IC were recruited in this study. The study cohort consisted of 19 females and 31 males (age 17-72 years, mean 45.9+/-11.9). Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET was performed in each patient after completion of one (33 patients) or two (17 patients) courses of IC. Each patient was restaged on the basis of the (18)F-FDG PET results. Patients who were downstaged to stage I or II were classified as major responders; the rest were classified as non-major responders. RESULTS: Only 1 of the 23 major responders subsequently developed local recurrence. At the time of data analysis, all major responders were alive; by contrast, of the 27 non-major responders, 15 had locoregional recurrence or distant metastasis and nine had died (seven of NPC and two of treatment-related complications). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival in major responders (56.4+/-9.2 and 58.1+/-2.2 months) as compared with non-major responders (33.7+/-23.2 and 44.7+/-20.0 months), with p<0.0001 and p=0.0024, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that early restaging by a single whole-body (18)F-FDG PET scan after the first or second course of IC is useful for predicting therapeutic response and outcome in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.
Authors: R L Hong; L L Ting; J Y Ko; M M Hsu; T S Sheen; P J Lou; C C Wang; N N Chung; L T Lui Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: I C Smith; A E Welch; A W Hutcheon; I D Miller; S Payne; F Chilcott; S Waikar; T Whitaker; A K Ah-See; O Eremin; S D Heys; F J Gilbert; P F Sharp Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P Bassa; E E Kim; T Inoue; F C Wong; M Korkmaz; D J Yang; W H Wong; K W Hicks; A U Buzdar; D A Podoloff Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: K Spaepen; S Stroobants; P Dupont; P Vandenberghe; J Thomas; T de Groot; J Balzarini; C De Wolf-Peeters; L Mortelmans; G Verhoef Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Daniel K L Cheuk; Noah D Sabin; Moinul Hossain; Amy Wozniak; Mihir Naik; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew J Krasin; Barry L Shulkin Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Bingsheng Huang; Ching-Yee Oliver Wong; Vincent Lai; Dora Lai-Wan Kwong; Pek-Lan Khong Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Neval E Wareham; J D Lundgren; C Da Cunha-Bang; F Gustafsson; M Iversen; H H Johannesen; A Kjær; A Rasmussen; H Sengeløv; S S Sørensen; B M Fischer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-11-12 Impact factor: 9.236