Literature DB >> 11990265

Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique.

G Della Rocca1, M G Costa, L Pompei, C Coccia, P Pietropaoli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output (CO) can be measured intermittently by bolus thermodilution methods in the pulmonary artery (COpa) or in the aorta (COart). A continuous thermodilution method (CCO) and a method for continuous estimation using the arterial pulse wave (PCCO) are also available.
METHODS: We compared two methods of intermittent CO measurements in patients during liver transplantation: COpa, regarded as the current clinical standard, and an aortic transpulmonary thermodilution technique (COart) performed with the PiCCO system. We also compared CCO and PCCO. Measurements were made in 62 patients at three stages: after the induction of anaesthesia, after caval clamping phase, and at the end of surgery. We used Bland-Altman and correlation analysis.
RESULTS: We found close agreement between the techniques. Mean bias between COart and COpa and PCCO and CCO was 0.15 (2SD of differences between methods=1.74) litre min(-1) and -0.03 (1.75) litre min(-1), respectively. Mean bias between CCO and COpa and PCCO and COpa was 0.02 (1.48) litre min(-1) and 0.04 (1.69) litre min(-1), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement with the aortic transpulmonary thermodilution technique gives continuous and intermittent values that agree with the pulmonary thermodilution method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11990265     DOI: 10.1093/bja/88.3.350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  52 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Ali El-Solh; Peter Papadakos; Nader Djalal Nader
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Burn resuscitation: is it straightforward or a challenge?

Authors:  S Hayek; A Ibrahim; G Abu Sittah; B Atiyeh
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2011-03-31

3.  Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.

Authors:  Youn Joung Cho; Chang-Hoon Koo; Tae Kyong Kim; Deok Man Hong; Yunseok Jeon
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Impact of misplaced subclavian vein catheter into jugular vein on transpulmonary thermodilution measurement variables.

Authors:  Wen-qiao Yu; Yun Zhang; Shao-yang Zhang; Zhong-yan Liang; Shui-qiao Fu; Jia Xu; Ting-bo Liang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 5.  [Measurement of cardiac output].

Authors:  D A Reuter; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  A new non-invasive continuous cardiac output trend solely utilizing routine cardiovascular monitors.

Authors:  Hironori Ishihara; Hirobumi Okawa; Ken Tanabe; Toshihito Tsubo; Yoshihiro Sugo; Takeshi Akiyama; Sunao Takeda
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Reliability of continuous pulse contour cardiac output measurement during hemodynamic instability.

Authors:  Anders Johansson; Michelle Chew
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Assessment of drift of pulse contour cardiac output over varying recalibration intervals.

Authors:  Martin Boyle; Margherita Murgo; Maureen O'Brien
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  [Cardiopulmonary monitoring in gastroenterological and renal emergencies].

Authors:  K Pethig; H R Figulla
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  [Non-invasive extended hemodynamic monitoring. Reduction of circulatory risk situations].

Authors:  M Bock; T Sturm; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.