Literature DB >> 11988804

The effects of increased intraabdominal pressure on colonic anastomoses.

C Polat1, Y Arikan, C Vatansev, G Akbulut, S Yilmaz, F H Dilek, O Gokçe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This experimental, randomized, controlled study was designed to investigate the effects of increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) on colocolic anastomoses. To our knowledge, this is the first study to address this important issue.
METHODS: For this study, 50 Wistar albino rats were randomized into five groups. The animals in all the groups underwent laparotomy and colocolic anastomosis. The rats in the control group were not subjected to increased IAP. Accordingly, IAP's of 14, 20, 25, and 30 mmHg were established by carbon dioxide insufflation and maintained for 60 min in study groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Colocolic anastomosis was realized after these periods of IAP in the study groups. Half of the surviving rats in all the groups were sacrificed on postoperative days 7 and 14 to allow comparison between the control and study groups with respect to their mean body weights, mean anastomosis bursting pressures, and histopathologic characteristics of their anastomosis sites.
RESULTS: The mean body weights of all the groups were comparable at all times during the study. The anastomosis bursting pressures of the animals subjected to increased IAP were lower than that of the control group, with the differences reaching statistical relevance for the animals subjected to an IAP of 20 mmHg or higher on postoperative day 7 (p <0.0005 for study groups 2, 3, and 4 vs the control group) and becoming more pronounced by the day 14 (p <0.0005 for study groups 2, 3, and 4 vs the control group). The anastomosis bursting pressure showed an inverse correlation with IAP. The adequacy of mucosal layer formation at the anastomosis line was lower and the degree of inflammation was higher in the groups exposed to an IAP of 20 mmHg or higher in the control group (p <0.05 for both comparisons among study groups 2, 3 and 4 vs the control group).
CONCLUSIONS: An IAP increased to 20 mmHg and higher was found to result in impaired strength and wound healing in colocolic anastomoses, as reflected by the decreased bursting pressure and mucosal layer formation, and by the increased inflammation at the anastomosis sites of animals subjected to high IAP values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11988804     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9193-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  E H Phillips; M Franklin; B J Carroll; M J Fallas; R Ramos; D Rosenthal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Effect of acute elevation of portal venous pressure on mesenteric blood volume, interstitial fluid volume and hemodynamics.

Authors:  E E SELKURT; P C JOHNSON
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on hepatic arterial, portal venous, and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow.

Authors:  L N Diebel; R F Wilson; S A Dulchavsky; J Saxe
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1992-08

Review 4.  Laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  H Tomita; P W Marcello; J W Milsom
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effects of prolonged increased intra-abdominal pressure on gastrointestinal blood flow in pigs.

Authors:  F F Gudmundsson; H G Gislason; A Dicko; A Horn; A Viste; K Grong; K Svanes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Abdominal compartment syndrome. The Nashville experience.

Authors:  V Eddy; C Nunn; J A Morris
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  D B Safran; R Orlando
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Effects of pneumoperitoneum on splanchnic hemodynamics: an experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  I B Rasmussen; U Berggren; D Arvidsson; M Ljungdahl; U Haglund
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1995-11

9.  Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on mesenteric arterial and intestinal mucosal blood flow.

Authors:  L N Diebel; S A Dulchavsky; R F Wilson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1992-07

10.  Gut ischemia, oxidative stress, and bacterial translocation in elevated abdominal pressure in rats.

Authors:  E Eleftheriadis; K Kotzampassi; K Papanotas; N Heliadis; K Sarris
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  15 in total

1.  Does ischemia occur during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  C Polat; S Yilmaz; O Gökçe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopy and collagen metabolism.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; M Binnebösel; P Bertram; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Gas-related impact of pneumoperitoneum on systemic wound healing.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; M Binnebösel; N Mirgartz; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Laparoscopic surgery and its detrimental effects on small and large bowel anastomes.

Authors:  Serdar Turkyilmaz; Ayhan Dinckan; Coskun Polat
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Preconditioning-like amelioration of erythropoietin against laparoscopy-induced oxidative injury.

Authors:  E Ates; S Yilmaz; E Ihtiyar; B Yasar; E Karahuseyinoglu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The effect of NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester on colonic anastomosis after increased intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  C Polat; Y Arikan; C Gokce; F Aktepe; G Akbulut; S Yilmaz; O Gokce
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal compartment syndrome in acute general surgery.

Authors:  Michael Sugrue; Yasir Buhkari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Impact of pressure and gas type on anastomotic wound healing in rats.

Authors:  Raphael Rosch; M Stumpf; K Junge; D Ardic; F Ulmer; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Early elevation of intra-abdominal pressure after laparotomy for secondary peritonitis: a predictor of relaparotomy?

Authors:  Adhish Basu; Dinker R Pai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Intestinal permeability, systemic endotoxemia, and bacterial translocation after open or laparoscopic resection for colon cancer: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mario Schietroma; Beatrice Pessia; Francesco Carlei; Emanuela Marina Cecilia; Gianfranco Amicucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.