Literature DB >> 11986111

Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.

Andreas U Bayer1, Carl Erb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical use of a test battery of short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT), and pattern electroretinography (PERG) in predicting progressive glaucomatous visual field defects on standard automated perimetry (SAP). STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, longitudinal, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty-two patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects on SAP were followed at 6-month intervals over a period of 30 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short wavelength automated perimetry, FDT, and PERG results were compared between POAG eyes with and without progressive field loss on SAP. These two groups were used to evaluate whether PERG, SWAP, and/or FDT is predictive of future progression of field loss on SAP.
RESULTS: Using the criteria of progressive field loss on SAP defined by the Collaborative Normal Tension Glaucoma Study, 54 eyes (study group) of 54 POAG patients showed progressive defects, whereas 84 eyes (control group) of 84 POAG patients showed no progression. Only 11.1% (6 of 54) of the eyes with a progression of field loss on SAP showed no increase of deficits on the three functional tests before progression. Short wavelength automated perimetry detected early progressive defects on SAP in 43 of the 54 eyes (79.6%). Of these 54 POAG eyes, FDT showed progressive deficits in 40 eyes (74.1%), whereas PERG amplitude P1N2 showed progressive deficits in 35 eyes (64.8%) before progression of field loss on SAP. A test battery consisting of SWAP and PERG P1N2-amplitude was able to detect 88.9% of eyes before a prediction of field loss on SAP. When comparing the results of the two functional tests, SWAP and FDT in the 84 eyes without progression of field loss on SAP between baseline and at 30 months, SWAP and FDT showed progressive deficits in 34.5% and 35.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: All three tests (SWAP, FDT, and PERG) have been successful in detecting glaucoma eyes with a future progression of standard visual field defects. A test battery of SWAP and PERG P1N2-amplitude improved the power to predict these progressive defects on SAP. It remains to be seen whether the long-term follow-up in POAG eyes will improve the false-positive rate of SWAP and FDT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11986111     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01015-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  33 in total

1.  Pattern electroretinogram progression in glaucoma suspects.

Authors:  Lori M Ventura; Iuri Golubev; William J Feuer; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Pattern reversal ERG with LED-stimulation using cyclic summation technique.

Authors:  Barbara Link; Anselm Jünemann; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Interpretation of the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 test in the diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Jin A Choi; Na Young Lee; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  [Functional glaucoma diagnosis].

Authors:  C Erb; K Göbel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Comparison of different methods of inter-eye asymmetry of rim area and disc area analysis.

Authors:  A A K Fansi; H Boisjoly; M Chagnon; P J Harasymowycz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Agreement between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and Heidelberg retinal tomography 3.

Authors:  Na Young Lee; Hye Jin Chung; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic efficiency of frequency-doubling technology for primary glaucoma.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Xiangge He
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2007-02

9.  Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry.

Authors:  Zvia Burgansky-Eliash; Gadi Wollstein; Avni Patel; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; William D Dilworth; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change.

Authors:  Daniel Meira-Freitas; Andrew J Tatham; Renato Lisboa; Tung-Mei Kuang; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.