Literature DB >> 11985308

A 2-D liquid separations/mass mapping method for interlysate comparison of ovarian cancers.

Maureen T Kachman1, Haixing Wang, Donald R Schwartz, Kathleen R Cho, David M Lubman.   

Abstract

A two-dimensional liquid phase separation of proteins from whole cell lysates coupled on-line to an electrospray-ionization time-of-flight (ESI-TOF) mass spectrometer (MS) is used to map the protein content of ovarian surface epithelial cells (OSE) and an ovarian carcinoma-derived cell line (ES2). The two dimensions involve the use of liquid isoelectric focusing as the first phase and nonporous silica reversed-phase HPLC as the second phase of separation. Accurate molecular weight (MW) values are then obtained upon the basis of ESI-TOFMS so that an image of isolectric point (pI) versus MW analogous to 2-D gel electrophoresis is produced. The accurate MW together with the pI fraction and corresponding hydrophobicity (%B) are used to tag each protein so that protein expression can be compared in interlysate studies. Each protein is also identified on the basis of matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization (MALDI) TOFMS peptide mapping and intact MW so that a standard map is produced against which other cell lines can be compared. Quantitative changes in protein expression are measured in these interlysate comparisons using internal standards in the on-line ESI-TOFMS process. In the ovarian epithelial cell lines under study, it is shown that in the three pI fractions chosen for detailed analysis, over 50 unique proteins can be detected per fraction, of which 40% can be identified from web-based databases. It is also shown that when using an accurate MW to compare proteins in the OSE versus ovarian cancer sample, there are proteins highly expressed in cancer cells but not in normal cells. In addition, many of the proteins in the cancer sample appear to be down-regulated, as compared to the normal cells. This two-dimensional (2-D) liquid/mass mapping method may provide a means of studying proteins in interlysate comparisons not readily available by other methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11985308     DOI: 10.1021/ac011159c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  13 in total

1.  Identification of 2D-gel proteins: a comparison of MALDI/TOF peptide mass mapping to mu LC-ESI tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Hanjo Lim; Jimmy Eng; John R Yates; Sandra L Tollaksen; Carol S Giometti; James F Holden; Michael W W Adams; Claudia I Reich; Gary J Olsen; Lara G Hays
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Nanoflow LC/IMS-MS and LC/IMS-CID/MS of protein mixtures.

Authors:  Renã A Sowell; Stormy L Koeniger; Stephen J Valentine; Myeong Hee Moon; David E Clemmer
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Proteomic technology for biomarker profiling in cancer: an update.

Authors:  Moulay A Alaoui-Jamali; Ying-jie Xu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Comparative proteomic analysis of low stage and high stage endometrioid ovarian adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Hyeyeung Kim; Rong Wu; Kathleen R Cho; Dafydd G Thomas; Gabrielle Gossner; J Rebecca Liu; Thomas J Giordano; Kerby A Shedden; David E Misek; David M Lubman
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Inorganic pyrophosphatase (PPA1) is a negative prognostic marker for human gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yingchi Yang; Jun Cai; Jie Yin; Dong Wang; Zhigang Bai; Jun Zhang; Kangli Wang; Guanzhen Yu; Zhongtao Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

6.  Identification of candidate biomarkers in ovarian cancer serum by depletion of highly abundant proteins and differential in-gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  John D Andersen; Kristin L M Boylan; Feifei S Xue; Lorraine B Anderson; Bruce A Witthuhn; Todd W Markowski; Leeann Higgins; Amy P N Skubitz
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Comparison of two-dimensional fractionation techniques for shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  James A Dowell; Dustin C Frost; Jiang Zhang; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Differential protein mapping of ovarian serous adenocarcinomas: identification of potential markers for distinct tumor stage.

Authors:  Yanfei Wang; Rong Wu; Kathleen R Cho; Dafydd G Thomas; Gabrielle Gossner; J Rebecca Liu; Thomas J Giordano; Kerby A Shedden; David E Misek; David M Lubman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  Recent advances (2019-2021) of capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for multilevel proteomics.

Authors:  Daoyang Chen; Elijah N McCool; Zhichang Yang; Xiaojing Shen; Rachele A Lubeckyj; Tian Xu; Qianjie Wang; Liangliang Sun
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 10.946

10.  Identification of Critical Elements for Regulation of Inorganic Pyrophosphatase (PPA1) in MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Dipti Ranjan Mishra; Sanjib Chaudhary; B Madhu Krishna; Sandip K Mishra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.