Literature DB >> 11985183

Genetic screening for Alzheimer's disease: what factors predict intentions to take a test?

S Frost1, L B Myers, S P Newman.   

Abstract

The authors investigated factors that predict intention to take a genetic test for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The 449 men and women were surveyed in two groups: (a) those told that a positive result meant a 90% chance of developing AD (increased certainty) and (b) those told that a positive result meant a 50% chance of developing AD (decreased certainty). Participants completed measures of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), anticipated regret, risk perception, likelihood of taking a genetic test for cancer, and AD risk factors. Just over 50% of the variance in intentions was related to TPB variables, likelihood of taking a genetic test for cancer, number of people the participants knew who had AD, experimental condition, and anticipated regret. The subjective norm was the strongest predictor of intention in the increased certainty group, whereas positive belief was the strongest predictor in the decreased certainty group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11985183     DOI: 10.1080/08964280109595776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Med        ISSN: 0896-4289            Impact factor:   3.104


  10 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Psychosocial determinants of intention to screen for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  James E Galvin; Qiang Fu; Joseph T Nguyen; Cristie Glasheen; Darcell P Scharff
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 5.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Online discussion effects on intention to participate in genetic research: A longitudinal experimental study.

Authors:  Sojung Claire Kim; Joseph N Cappella; Vincent Price
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2016-04-06

7.  Measuring primary care patients' attitudes about dementia screening.

Authors:  Malaz Boustani; Anthony J Perkins; Patrick Monahan; Chris Fox; Lea Watson; John Hopkins; Bridget Fultz; Siu Hui; Frederick W Unverzagt; Christopher M Callahan; Hugh C Hendrie
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.485

8.  On averages and peaks: how do people integrate attitudes about multiple diseases to reach a decision about multiplex genetic testing?

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Christopher H Wade; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Determinants of adults' intention to vaccinate against pandemic swine flu.

Authors:  Lynn B Myers; Robin Goodwin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Psychosocial approaches to participation in BRCA1/2 genetic risk assessment among African American women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Laura-Kate Shaw; Karen Cavanagh; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-08-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.