Literature DB >> 11984866

Score test for detecting linkage to quantitative traits.

H Putter1, L A Sandkuijl, J C van Houwelingen.   

Abstract

The two most popular methods to detect linkage of a quantitative trait to a marker are the Haseman-Elston regression method and the variance components likelihood-ratio test. In the literature, these methods are frequently compared and the relative advantages and disadvantages of each method are well known. In this article, we derive a score test for the variance component attributable to a specific quantitative trait locus and show that for sib-pairs it is mathematically equivalent to a recently proposed version of the Haseman-Elston method that optimally combines the sum squared and the difference squared of the centered phenotype values of the sibs. Because score tests and likelihood-ratio tetsts are equivalent for large sample sizes, the variance components likelihood-ratio test is also asymptotically equivalent to this optimal Haseman-Elston test. This fact gives a theoretical explanation of the empirical observation from simulation studies reporting similar power of the variance components likelihood-ratio test and the optimal Haseman-Elston method. Perhaps more importantly for practical purposes, the score test can also be extended in a natural way to support the simultaneous analysis of more than two subjects and multivariate phenotypes. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11984866     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.01104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  17 in total

1.  A whole-genome screen of a quantitative trait of age-related maculopathy in sibships from the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  James H Schick; Sudha K Iyengar; Barbara E Klein; Ronald Klein; Karlie Reading; Rachel Liptak; Christopher Millard; Kristine E Lee; Sandra C Tomany; Emily L Moore; Bonnie A Fijal; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees.

Authors:  Pak C Sham; Shaun Purcell; Stacey S Cherny; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Regression-based quantitative-trait-locus mapping in the 21st century.

Authors:  Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A powerful and robust method for mapping quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees.

Authors:  G Diao; D Y Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Robust score statistics for QTL linkage analysis.

Authors:  Samsiddhi Bhattacharjee; Chia-Ling Kuo; Nandita Mukhopadhyay; Guy N Brock; Daniel E Weeks; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A unified framework for linkage and association analysis of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Josée Dupuis; David O Siegmund; Benjamin Yakir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Applying novel genome-wide linkage strategies to search for loci influencing type 2 diabetes and adult height in American Samoa.

Authors:  Karolina Aberg; Guangyun Sun; Diane Smelser; Subba Rao Indugula; Hui-Ju Tsai; Matthew S Steele; John Tuitele; Ranjan Deka; Stephen T McGarvey; Daniel E Weeks
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.553

8.  Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for selected sibling pairs.

Authors:  Karen T Cuenco; Jin P Szatkiewicz; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  An improved method for quantitative trait loci detection and identification of within-line segregation in F2 intercross designs.

Authors:  Lars Rönnegård; Francois Besnier; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for discordant sibling pairs.

Authors:  Jin P Szatkiewicz; Karen T Cuenco; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.