Literature DB >> 11980770

Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization.

Sari Koivurova1, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen, Mika Gissler, Elina Hemminki, Ulla Sovio, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the neonatal outcome and the prevalence of congenital malformations in children born after IVF in northern Finland we carried out a population-based study with matched controls.
METHODS: Firstly, 304 IVF children born in 1990-1995 were compared with 569 controls, representing the general population in proportion of multiple births, randomly chosen from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (FMBR) and matched for sex, year of birth, area of residence, parity, maternal age and social class. Secondly, plurality matched controls (n = 103) for IVF twins (n =103) were randomly chosen from the FMBR and analysed separately. Additionally, IVF singletons (n = 153) were compared with singleton controls (n = 287). Mortality rates were compared with national figures from FMBR.
RESULTS: Most mortality rates were twice as high as national figures in the general population. When compared with the control group representing the general population, the incidences of preterm birth [odds ratio (OR) 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-8.6], very low birth weight (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.0-19.0), low birth weight (OR 9.8, 95% CI 5.6-17.3), neonatal morbidity (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.4) and hospitalization (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.2-4.6) were significantly higher in the IVF group. The prevalence of heart malformations was four-fold in the IVF population than in the controls representing the general population (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.4-11.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal outcome after IVF is worse than in the general population with similar maternal age, parity and social standing, mainly due to the large proportion of multifetal births after IVF. The higher prevalence of heart malformations does not solely arise from multiplicity but from other causes. In order to improve neonatal outcome after IVF, the number of embryos transferred should be limited to a minimum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11980770     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

Review 1.  Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Frans M Helmerhorst; Denise A M Perquin; Diane Donker; Marc J N C Keirse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-23

2.  Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study.

Authors:  C Allen; S Bowdin; R F Harrison; A G Sutcliffe; L Brueton; G Kirby; J Kirkman-Brown; C Barrett; W Reardon; E Maher
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo.

Authors:  Sunita Katari; Nahid Turan; Marina Bibikova; Oluwatoyin Erinle; Raffi Chalian; Michael Foster; John P Gaughan; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)--what are the risks?

Authors:  Joseph P Alukal; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  [NKX2.5 and TBX5 gene mutations in in vitro fertilization children with congenital heart disease].

Authors:  Jing-Hui Yang; Xiao-Yan Xu; Hong-Ying Mi; Yan Jiang; Xin-Mei Ma; Li Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2017-06

6.  The risk for four specific congenital heart defects associated with assisted reproductive techniques: a population-based evaluation.

Authors:  Karim Tararbit; Nathalie Lelong; Anne-Claire Thieulin; Lucile Houyel; Damien Bonnet; François Goffinet; Babak Khoshnood
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Smaller fetal size in singletons after infertility therapies: the influence of technology and the underlying infertility.

Authors:  Amber R Cooper; Kathleen E O'Neill; Jenifer E Allsworth; Emily S Jungheim; Anthony O Odibo; Diana L Gray; Valerie S Ratts; Kelle H Moley; Randall R Odem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  IVM is an alternative for patients with PCO after failed conventional IVF attempt.

Authors:  Bulent Gulekli; Muge Kovali; Fulya Aydiner; Sule Dogan; Seda S Dogan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Impact of assisted reproduction treatments on Spanish newborns: report of 14,119 pregnancies.

Authors:  E Ricciarelli; I Bruna; V Verdú; M J Torrelló; R Herrer; J M Gris; G Arroyo; F Pérez-Millán; F Del Río; M Fernández-Sánchez; Y Cabello; M Ardoy; S Fernández-Shaw
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.