OBJECTIVE: To compare the perinatal outcome of singleton and twin pregnancies between natural and assisted conceptions. DESIGN: Systematic review of controlled studies published 1985-2002. STUDIES REVIEWED: 25 studies were included of which 17 had matched and 8 had non-matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Very preterm birth, preterm birth, very low birth weight, low birth weight, small for gestational age, caesarean section, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and perinatal mortality. RESULTS: For singletons, studies with matched controls indicated a relative risk of 3.27 (95% confidence interval 2.03 to 5.28) for very preterm (< 32 weeks) and 2.04 (1.80 to 2.32) for preterm (< 37 weeks) birth in pregnancies after assisted conception. Relative risks were 3.00 (2.07 to 4.36) for very low birth weight (< 1500 g), 1.70 (1.50 to 1.92) for low birth weight (< 2500 g), 1.40 (1.15 to 1.71) for small for gestational age, 1.54 (1.44 to 1.66) for caesarean section, 1.27 (1.16 to 1.40) for admission to a neonatal intensive care unit, and 1.68 (1.11 to 2.55) for perinatal mortality. Results of the non-matched studies were similar. In matched studies of twin gestations, relative risks were 0.95 (0.78 to 1.15) for very preterm birth, 1.07 (1.02 to 1.13) for preterm birth, 0.89 (0.74 to 1.07) for very low birth weight, 1.03 (0.99 to 1.08) for low birth weight, 1.27 (0.97 to 1.65) for small for gestational age, 1.21 (1.11 to 1.32) for caesarean section, 1.05 (1.01 to 1.09) for admission to a neonatal intensive care unit, and 0.58 (0.44 to 0.77) for perinatal mortality. The non-matched studies mostly showed similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: Singleton pregnancies from assisted reproduction have a significantly worse perinatal outcome than non-assisted singleton pregnancies, but this is less so for twin pregnancies. In twin pregnancies, perinatal mortality is about 40% lower after assisted compared with natural conception.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the perinatal outcome of singleton and twin pregnancies between natural and assisted conceptions. DESIGN: Systematic review of controlled studies published 1985-2002. STUDIES REVIEWED: 25 studies were included of which 17 had matched and 8 had non-matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Very preterm birth, preterm birth, very low birth weight, low birth weight, small for gestational age, caesarean section, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and perinatal mortality. RESULTS: For singletons, studies with matched controls indicated a relative risk of 3.27 (95% confidence interval 2.03 to 5.28) for very preterm (< 32 weeks) and 2.04 (1.80 to 2.32) for preterm (< 37 weeks) birth in pregnancies after assisted conception. Relative risks were 3.00 (2.07 to 4.36) for very low birth weight (< 1500 g), 1.70 (1.50 to 1.92) for low birth weight (< 2500 g), 1.40 (1.15 to 1.71) for small for gestational age, 1.54 (1.44 to 1.66) for caesarean section, 1.27 (1.16 to 1.40) for admission to a neonatal intensive care unit, and 1.68 (1.11 to 2.55) for perinatal mortality. Results of the non-matched studies were similar. In matched studies of twin gestations, relative risks were 0.95 (0.78 to 1.15) for very preterm birth, 1.07 (1.02 to 1.13) for preterm birth, 0.89 (0.74 to 1.07) for very low birth weight, 1.03 (0.99 to 1.08) for low birth weight, 1.27 (0.97 to 1.65) for small for gestational age, 1.21 (1.11 to 1.32) for caesarean section, 1.05 (1.01 to 1.09) for admission to a neonatal intensive care unit, and 0.58 (0.44 to 0.77) for perinatal mortality. The non-matched studies mostly showed similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: Singleton pregnancies from assisted reproduction have a significantly worse perinatal outcome than non-assisted singleton pregnancies, but this is less so for twin pregnancies. In twin pregnancies, perinatal mortality is about 40% lower after assisted compared with natural conception.
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction
Authors: S L Tan; P Doyle; S Campbell; V Beral; B Rizk; P Brinsden; B Mason; R G Edwards Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: K Petersen; P J Hornnes; S Ellingsen; F Jensen; V Brocks; J Starup; J R Jacobsen; A N Andersen Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Lauren P Hunt; A M McInerney-Leo; S Sinnott; B Sutton; R Cincotta; G Duncombe; J Chua; M Peterson Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 3.412