Literature DB >> 11966975

The influence of the location of load transfer on strains around implants supporting four unit cement-retained fixed prostheses: in vitro evaluation of axial versus off-set loading.

M C Cehreli1, H Iplikçioğlu, O G Bilir.   

Abstract

Prudent control of the biomechanical load on dental implants is imperative to achieve long-term clinical success. The design of the final prosthesis and location of force transmission have a definitive influence on the quantification of induced strains and load partitioning among implants. While axial loading of implants generate an even distribution of stresses in the bone around implants, off-set loading, which is particularly observed in screw retained prosthesis increases the stresses at the bone-implant interface. This study evaluated the cervical strains on dental implants supporting four unit cement retained fixed prostheses under 50 N static axial and off-set loading conditions. As the type of strains are also dependent on the point of load transfer, design of the prosthesis and implant positioning, the study comprised the evaluation of induced strains through a simulation of five cement retained prosthetic options. The results revealed that off-set loading increases the magnitude of strains. However, it was not significant for all configurations (P < 0.05). This finding emphasizes the accompanying effect of implant location, angulation and macrogeometry of the prosthesis and, that the biomechanical evaluation of affecting factors is a multifaceted phenomenon.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11966975     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00867.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  5 in total

1.  Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.

Authors:  Murat Cavit Cehreli; Murat Akkocaoglu; Ayhan Comert; Ibrahim Tekdemir; Kivanc Akca
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.

Authors:  Zeynep Gümrükçü; Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Stress distribution of multiple implant-supported prostheses: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses of external hexagon and morse taper connections.

Authors:  Ana-Beatriz-Bueno-Carlini Bittencourt; Erica-de Oliveira-Paiva Rezende; Marcio Campaner; Sandro-Basso Bitencourt; Daniela-Micheline Dos Santos; Aldiéris-Alves Pesqueira; Marcelo-Coelho Goiato
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 4.  Angulated implants: an alternative to bone augmentation and sinus lift procedure: systematic review.

Authors:  Nikhil Asawa; Nilesh Bulbule; Dilip Kakade; Riddhi Shah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

5.  Stress distribution in fixed mandibular prostheses fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional techniques: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses.

Authors:  Rodrigo-Antonio de Medeiros; Daniela-Micheline Dos Santos; Aldiéris-Alves Pesqueira; Marcio Campaner; Sandro-Basso Bitencourt; Emily-Vivianne-Freitas da Silva; Marcelo-Coelho Goiato
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.