Literature DB >> 11966664

The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous, nebulized and oral morphine-6-glucuronide.

Richard T Penson1, Simon P Joel, Michael Roberts, Anna Gloyne, Stephen Beckwith, Maurice L Slevin.   

Abstract

AIMS: Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), one of the active metabolites of morphine, has attracted considerable interest as a potent opioid analgesic with an apparently superior therapeutic index. To date studies have used the intravenous route, which is generally unacceptable in the treatment of cancer related pain. The aim of this study was to define the pharmacokinetics, toxicity and cardio-respiratory effects of three alternative routes of administration of M6G.
METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers participated in an open randomized study. Subjects received M6G 2 mg as an intravenous bolus, 20 mg orally, 2 mg subcutaneously and 4 mg by the nebulized route. Pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate and peak flow rate were monitored and subjective toxicity recorded on rating and visual analogue scales.
RESULTS: After i.v. M6G the mean (+/- s.d.) AUC(0,infinity) standardized to a dose of 1 mg was 223 +/- 57 nmol l(-1) h, mean elimination half-life was 1.7 +/- 0.7 h and the mean clearance was 157 +/- 46 ml min(-1). These parameters were virtually identical after subcutaneous administration which had a bioavailability (F(0,infinity)) of 102 +/- 35% (90% CI 82, 117%) and t(max) of 0.5 +/- 0.2 h. The mean bioavailability of nebulized M6G was 6 +/- 2% (90% CI 4, 7%) with a t(max) of 1.2 +/- 0.8 h. Following oral M6G two plasma M6G peaks were seen in 7 of the 10 subjects, the first with a t(max) of 3.1 (+/- 0.9) h. The second peak had a t(max) of 13.4 (+/-5.0) h, started approximately 4 h after dosing, and was associated with the detection of plasma M3G and morphine, suggesting that M6G was significantly hydrolysed in the gut to morphine, which was then glucuronidated following absorption. Although the overall mean bioavailability was 11 +/- 3% (90% CI 9, 12%), confining the analysis to data from the first peak suggested a bioavailability of directly absorbed M6G of only 4 +/- 4%. Apart from a characteristic dysphoria following intravenous and subcutaneous M6G, there was no significant toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: With the minimal toxicity reported in this and previous studies, subcutaneous infusion of M6G may potentially provide clinically useful analgesia for advanced cancer pain. Nebulized M6G is not significantly absorbed via the lungs, and if opiates are shown to have a local effect in the lung, reducing the sensation of breathlessness, then nebulized administration is likely to minimize systemic effects. Oral M6G has poor bioavailability, but is significantly hydrolysed in the gut to morphine, which is subsequently glucuronidated following absorption. This circuitous route accounts for the majority of systemically available M6G after oral administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11966664      PMCID: PMC1874271          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01554.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  33 in total

1.  Central effects of antitussive drugs on cough and respiration.

Authors:  N K CHAKRAVARTY; A MATALLANA; R JENSEN; H L BORISON
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1956-06       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Effect of inhaled morphine on the development of breathlessness during exercise in patients with chronic lung disease.

Authors:  R Leung; P Hill; J Burdon
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Biochemical basis for analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide. I. Penetration of morphine-6-glucuronide in the brain of rats.

Authors:  H Yoshimura; S Ida; K Oguri; H Tsukamoto
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1973-06-15       Impact factor: 5.858

4.  Analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide.

Authors:  R Osborne; S Joel; D Trew; M Slevin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-04-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Lack of analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide after short-term intravenous administration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J Lötsch; G Kobal; A Stockmann; K Brune; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Morphine-6-glucuronide: analgesic effects and receptor binding profile in rats.

Authors:  F V Abbott; R M Palmour
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Morphine-6-glucuronide: effects on ventilation in normal volunteers.

Authors:  S J Peat; M H Hanna; M Woodham; A A Knibb; J Ponte
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Morphine has a dual concentration-dependent effect on K(+)-evoked substance P release from rat peripheral airways.

Authors:  P J Cabot; T Cramond; M T Smith
Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.410

9.  Morphine glucuronidation in human fetal and adult liver.

Authors:  G M Pacifici; J Säwe; L Kager; A Rane
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  The analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide.

Authors:  R Osborne; P Thompson; S Joel; D Trew; N Patel; M Slevin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  7 in total

1.  Blood-brain distribution of morphine-6-glucuronide in sheep.

Authors:  H H Villesen; D J R Foster; R N Upton; L L Christrup; A A Somogyi; A Martinez; C Grant
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Pharmacokinetics of morphine-6-glucuronide following oral administration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Hanne H Villesen; Kim Kristensen; Steen H Hansen; Niels-Henrik Jensen; Ulrik Skram; Lona L Christrup
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Accidental subcutaneous remifentanil infusion as a cause of delayed awakening after craniotomy.

Authors:  Alexander Wolfson; Cephas Swamidoss
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-11-03

4.  Sugar Derivatives of Morphine: A New Window for the Development of Potent Anesthetic Drugs.

Authors:  Shyamal K Jash; Dilip Gorai
Journal:  Nat Prod Bioprospect       Date:  2015-05-22

5.  A Prospective Population Pharmacokinetic Study on Morphine Metabolism in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Astrid W Oosten; João A Abrantes; Siv Jönsson; Maja Matic; Ron H N van Schaik; Peter de Bruijn; Carin C D van der Rijt; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  The pharmacokinetics of the interstitial space in humans.

Authors:  David G Levitt
Journal:  BMC Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-07-30

Review 7.  Misuse of Tramadol in the United States: An Analysis of the National Survey of Drug Use and Health 2002-2017.

Authors:  Scott A Reines; Bonnie Goldmann; Mark Harnett; Lucy Lu
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2020-06-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.