Literature DB >> 9416720

Lack of analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide after short-term intravenous administration in healthy volunteers.

J Lötsch1, G Kobal, A Stockmann, K Brune, G Geisslinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) is well recognized for its contribution to the effects of morphine and its possible use as an opioid analgesic with a wider therapeutic range than morphine. The present study attempted to quantify the relative contribution of M-6-G to analgesia observed after systemic administration of morphine.
METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, sixfold crossover study in 20 healthy men, the effects of M-6-G were assessed at steady-state plasma concentrations of M-6-G identical to and two and three times higher than those measured after administration of morphine. Morphine and M-6-G were administered as an intravenous bolus followed by infusion over 4 h. Dosage A was M-6-G-bolus of 0.015 mg/kg plus infusion of 0.0072 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Dosage B was M-6-G-bolus of 0.029 mg/kg plus infusion of 0.014 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Dosage C was M-6-G-bolus of 0.044 mg/kg plus infusion of 0.022 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Dosage D was a morphine bolus of 0.14 mg/kg plus infusion of 0.05 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 4 h. Dosage E was M-6-G combined with morphine (doses A + D). Dosage F was a placebo. The analgesic effects of M-6-G and morphine were measured before administration of the bolus and after 3.5 h using an experimental pain model based on pain-related cortical potentials and pain ratings after specific stimulation of the nasal nociceptor with short pulses of gaseous carbon dioxide.
RESULTS: Morphine significantly reduced subjective and objective pain correlates compared with placebo. In contrast, M-6-G produced no statistically significant effects. The addition of M-6-G to morphine did not increase the effects of morphine. Morphine produced significantly more side effects than M-6-G.
CONCLUSION: After short-term intravenous administration at doses that produce plasma concentrations of M-6-G similar to those seen after administration of morphine, M-6-G had no analgesic effects in the present placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9416720     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  15 in total

Review 1.  Role of active metabolites in the use of opioids.

Authors:  Janet K Coller; Lona L Christrup; Andrew A Somogyi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease.

Authors:  I Tegeder; J Lötsch; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Separating brain processing of pain from that of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Bruno G Oertel; Christine Preibisch; Till Martin; Carmen Walter; Matthias Gamer; Ralf Deichmann; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Single-sweep spectral analysis of contact heat evoked potentials: a novel approach to identify altered cortical processing after morphine treatment.

Authors:  Tine M Hansen; Carina Graversen; Jens B Frøkjaer; Anne E Olesen; Massimiliano Valeriani; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The pharmacogenetics of codeine pain relief in the postpartum period.

Authors:  M Baber; S Chaudhry; L Kelly; C Ross; B Carleton; H Berger; G Koren
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  HPLC with laser-induced native fluorescence detection for morphine and morphine glucuronides from blood after immunoaffinity extraction.

Authors:  Y Hupka; J Beike; J Roegener; B Brinkmann; G Blaschke; H Köhler
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Cyclosporine-inhibitable blood-brain barrier drug transport influences clinical morphine pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Konrad Meissner; Michael J Avram; Viktar Yermolenka; Amber M Francis; Jane Blood; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Morphine-6-glucuronide: an analgesic of the future?

Authors:  J Lötsch; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Intranasal trigeminal sensitivity in subjects with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  H Doerfler; T Hummel; L Klimek; G Kobal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Electroencephalography and analgesics.

Authors:  Lasse Paludan Malver; Anne Brokjaer; Camilla Staahl; Carina Graversen; Trine Andresen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.