Literature DB >> 11961625

Time-action analysis of instrument positioners in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

K T den Boer1, M Bruijn, J E Jaspers, L P S Stassen, W F M Erp, A Jansen, P M N Y H Go, J Dankelman, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Instrument positioners can position and lock a laparoscopic instrument. This study uses time-action analysis to evaluate objectively whether IPs can substitute for a surgical assistant efficiently and safely.
METHODS: In four hospitals, 78 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were randomly assisted by a surgical assistant or an instrument positioner (AESOP and PASSIST) The efficiency and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomies were analyzed with respect to time, number and type of actions, positioning accuracy, and peroperative complications. A questionnaire evaluated the difficulties for each operation and the comfort of instrument positioner use.
RESULTS: The PASSIST and AESOP were able to replace the surgical assistant during laparoscopic cholecystectomies without significantly changing either the efficiency or the safety of the operation. The questionnaire showed that the surgeons preferred to operate with an instrument positioner.
CONCLUSION: This study assessed objectively that instrument positioners can substitute for a surgical assistant efficiently and safely in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11961625     DOI: 10.1007/s004640090127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

Review 1.  Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education.

Authors:  Badma Bashankaev; Sergey Baido; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caiwen Han; Xinyi Shan; Liang Yao; Peijing Yan; Meixuan Li; Lidong Hu; Hongwei Tian; Wutang Jing; Binbin Du; Lixia Wang; Kehu Yang; Tiankang Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Technical and instrumental prerequisites for single-port laparoscopic solo surgery: state of art.

Authors:  Say-June Kim; Sang Chul Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yasushi Ohmura; Hiromitsu Suzuki; Kazutoshi Kotani; Atsushi Teramoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Kumarakrishnan Samraj; Giuseppe Fusai; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

7.  Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator.

Authors:  J R Korndorffer; D J Hayes; J B Dunne; R Sierra; C L Touchard; R J Markert; D J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?

Authors:  B M Kraft; C Jäger; K Kraft; B J Leibl; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study.

Authors:  Say-June Kim; Byung-Jo Choi; Wonjun Jeong; Sang Chul Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  Preliminary results of using a voice-controlled robotic camera driver during 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Piotr Kania; Maciej Salagierski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-12-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.