Literature DB >> 11958406

Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.

Tong-Mei Wang1, Liang-Jenq Leu, Juosong Wang, Li-Deh Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A 3-dimensional finite element model consisting of a bone block and 2 simulated premolar crowns supported by 2 adjacent cylindric implants without immediately surrounding cortical bone was generated and used to investigate the effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on the peri-implant bone stress under static loads.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The peri-implant maximum equivalent bone stress (von Mises [VM] stress) was evaluated when a vertical or a horizontal load of 1 N was applied to the center of a single resin, gold alloy, or porcelain crown, nonsplinted or splinted to the adjacent crown.
RESULTS: The numeric results indicated that: (1) in a single crown, no significant difference could be found in the maximum VM stress between different materials for both vertical and horizontal loading; (2) splinting the crowns reduced the maximum VM stress induced by the horizontal load, and the maximum VM stress increased about 14% for the horizontal loading when the restorative material was changed from gold alloy or porcelain to resin. DISCUSSION: Under the condition of this study's analysis, prosthesis materials of a single crown have insignificant effects on the peri-implant bone stress. Splinting the crowns reduced the peri-implant bone stress under horizontal load, and gold alloy and porcelain each demonstrated less peri-implant bone stress than resin in the splinted crown situation under static horizontal load.
CONCLUSION: Splinting the crowns of adjacent implants with relatively stiff restorative materials is recommended for implants surrounded by poor-quality bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11958406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  15 in total

1.  An experimental and theoretical composite model of the human mandible.

Authors:  R De Santis; F Mollica; R Esposito; L Ambrosio; L Nicolais
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  In vitro assessment of the accuracy of digital impressions prepared using a single system for full-arch restorations on implants.

Authors:  Leonardo Ciocca; Roberto Meneghello; Carlo Monaco; Gianpaolo Savio; Lorenzo Scheda; Maria Rosaria Gatto; Paolo Baldissara
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Finite Element Analysis of effect of cusp inclination and occlusal contacts in PFM and PEEK implant-supported crowns on resultant stresses.

Authors:  Githanjali Manchikalapudi; Sreeramulu Basapogu
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-01-16

4.  Use of separate single-tooth implant restorations to replace two or more consecutive posterior teeth: a prospective cohort study for up to 1 year.

Authors:  Min-Jung Kwon; In-Sung Yeo; Young-Kyun Kim; Yang-Jin Yi; Jae-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Stress distribution of various designs of prostheses on short implants or standard implants in posterior maxilla: a three dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  K Jomjunyong; P Rungsiyakull; C Rungsiyakull; W Aunmeungtong; M Chantaramungkorn; P Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

6.  Stress distribution around different abutments on titanium and CFR-PEEK implant with different prosthetic crowns under parafunctional loading: A 3D FEA study.

Authors:  Akanksha Mourya; Rajvi Nahar; Sunil Kumar Mishra; Ramesh Chowdhary
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-03-16

7.  Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology.

Authors:  Wicher J van der Meer; Frank S Andriessen; Daniel Wismeijer; Yijin Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Survival of immediately versus delayed loaded short implants: A prospective case series study.

Authors:  Joaquin Alvira-González; Erick Díaz-Campos; Maria-Angeles Sánchez-Garcés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-07-01

9.  The effect of implant angulation and splinting on stress distribution in implant body and supporting bone: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ebadian Behnaz; Mosharraf Ramin; Samaneh Abbasi; Memar Ardestani Pouya; Farzin Mahmood
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

10.  Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm) versus Standard Dental Implants (≥10 mm): A One-Year Post-Loading Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Guillermo Pardo-Zamora; Antonio José Ortiz-Ruíz; Fabio Camacho-Alonso; José Francisco Martínez-Marco; Juan Manuel Molina-González; Núria Piqué-Clusella; Ascensión Vicente-Hernández
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.