Literature DB >> 11955981

Evaluation of measurement strategies to increase the reliability of EMG indices to assess back muscle fatigue and recovery.

C Larivière1, A B Arsenault, D Gravel, D Gagnon, P Loisel.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess different measurement strategies to increase the reliability of different electromyographic (EMG) indices developed for the assessment of back muscle impairments. Forty male volunteers (20 controls and 20 chronic low back pain patients) were assessed on three sessions at least 2 days apart within 2 weeks. Surface EMG signals were recorded from four pairs (bilaterally) of back muscles (multifidus at the L5 level, iliocostalis lumborum at L3, and longissimus at L1 and T10) while the subjects performed, in a static dynamometer, two static trunk extension tasks at 75% of the maximal voluntary contraction separated by a 60 s rest period: (1) a 30 s fatigue task and (2) a 5 s recovery task. Different EMG indices (based on individual muscles or averaged across bilateral homologous muscles or across all muscles) were computed to evaluate muscular fatigue and recovery. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) in percentage of the grand mean were calculated for each EMG variable. Reliable EMG indices are achieved for both healthy and chronic low back pain subjects when (1) electrodes are positioned on medial back muscles (multifidus at the L5 level and longissimus at L1) and (2) measures are averaged across bilateral muscles and/or across two fatigue tests performed within a session. The most reliable EMG indices were the bilateral average of medial back muscles (ICC range: 0.68-0.91; SEM range: 5-35%) and the average of all back muscles (ICC range: 0.77-0.91; SEM range: 5-30%). The averaging of measures across two fatigue tests is predicted to increase the reliability by about 13%. With regards to EMG indices of fatigue, the identification of the most fatigable muscle also lead to satisfactory results (ICC range: 0.74-0.79; SEM range: 21-26%). The assessment of back muscle impairments through EMG analysis necessitates the use of multiple electrodes to achieve reliable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11955981     DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00011-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  22 in total

1.  The use of non-amplitude components of the myoelectric signal in identifying differences in function between the low back injured and controls.

Authors:  Gregory J Lehman
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-09

2.  Peculiarities of extracellular potentials produced by deep muscles. Part 2: motor unit potentials.

Authors:  T I Arabadzhiev
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Diagnostic value of trunk flexion-extension testing in old chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Kienbacher; Elisabeth Fehrmann; Richard Habenicht; Christian Oeffel; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Is the timed loaded standing test a valid measure of back muscle endurance in people with vertebral osteoporosis?

Authors:  M Newman; R Newman; T Hughes; K Vadher; K L Barker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Lumbar muscle fatigue and subjective health measurements in patients with lumbar disc herniation 2 years after surgery.

Authors:  Åsa Dedering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  EMG recovery and ratings after back extensor fatigue in patients with lumbar disc herniation and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Asa Dedering; Britt Elfving; Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Variation in the spatial distribution of erector spinae activity during a lumbar endurance task in people with low back pain.

Authors:  Andy Sanderson; Eduardo Martinez-Valdes; Nicola R Heneghan; Carlos Murillo; Alison Rushton; Deborah Falla
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Healthy humans use sex-specific co-ordination patterns of trunk muscles during gait.

Authors:  C Anders; H Wagner; C Puta; R Grassme; H C Scholle
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  A reliability of electromyographic normalization methods for the infraspinatus muscle in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Sung-Min Ha; Heon-Seock Cynn; Oh-Yun Kwon; Kyue-Nam Park; Gyoung-Mo Kim
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Disability and back muscle fatigability changes following two therapeutic exercise interventions in participants with recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Paul S Sung
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.