Literature DB >> 11954647

A national study of ethics committees.

G McGee1, A L Caplan, J P Spanogle, D A Asch.   

Abstract

Conceived as a solution to clinical dilemmas, and now required by organizations for hospital accreditation, ethics committees have been subject only to small-scale studies. The wide use of ethics committees and the diverse roles they have played compel study. In 1999 the University of Pennsylvania Ethics Committee Research Group (ECRG) completed the first national survey of the presence, composition, and activities of U.S. healthcare ethics committees (HECs). Ethics committees are relatively young, on average seven years in operation. Eighty-six percent of ethics committees report that they played a role in ongoing clinical decision making through clinical ethics consultation. All are engaged in developing institutional clinical policy. Although 4.5% of HECs write policy on managed care, 50% of HEC chairs feel inadequately prepared to address managed care. The power and activity of ethics committees parallels the composition of those committees and the relationship of members to their institutions. The role of ethics committees across the nation in making policies about clinical care is greater than was known, and ethics committees will likely continue to play an important role in the debate and resolution of clinical cases and clinical policies.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11954647     DOI: 10.1162/152651601317139531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  27 in total

1.  The impact of committee characteristics on the success of healthcare ethics committees.

Authors:  Lin Guo; Ida C Schick
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-09

2.  Criteria for determining the appropriate method for an ethics consultation.

Authors:  Martin L Smith; Annette K Bisanz; Ana J Kempfer; Barbie Adams; Toya G Candelari; Roxann K Blackburn
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-06

3.  The varieties of clinical consulting experience.

Authors:  James M Dubois
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-12

Review 4.  The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?

Authors:  E C Winkler
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  HEC member perspectives on the case analysis process: a qualitative multi-site study.

Authors:  Eric Racine
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-09

6.  The educational ladder model for ethics committees: confidence and change flourishing through core competency development.

Authors:  Deborah Pape; Suzanne Manning
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2006-12

7.  Quality in ethics consultations.

Authors:  Gerard Magill
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-11

8.  The changing composition of a hospital ethics committee: a tertiary care center's experience.

Authors:  Andrew Courtwright; Sharon Brackett; Alexandra Cist; M Cornelia Cremens; Eric L Krakauer; Ellen M Robinson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-03

9.  Five-year experience of clinical ethics consultations in a pediatric teaching hospital.

Authors:  Jürg C Streuli; Georg Staubli; Marlis Pfändler-Poletti; Ruth Baumann-Hölzle; Jörg Ersch
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 10.  Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chiara Crico; Virginia Sanchini; Paolo Giovanni Casali; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.