Literature DB >> 14686101

The impact of committee characteristics on the success of healthcare ethics committees.

Lin Guo1, Ida C Schick.   

Abstract

Despite the increase in number and importance of healthcare ethics committees (HECs), little is known about how successful HECs are and what characteristics contribute to their success. The current study attempted: (1) to examine the effect of respondent backgrounds on the self-reported success and characteristics of HECs, (2) to describe the current success status of HECs, and (3) to explore how committee characteristics are related with the success. Questionnaires on characteristics of respondents and committees as well as the rating of success were distributed to 962 acute care hospitals with 300 beds or more across the United States in the calendar year 2000. A total number of 294 chairpersons and 223 members from 334 ethics committees responded to the survey, yielding a 35% response rate. Statistical analyses on the survey data found that the length of services on committees (seniority) and the size of committees were significant contributors to the perceived success of committees. The significant association of seniority suggests that future studies should control for the effect of seniority, possibly using multivariate modeling methods. The more success perceived by large committees indicates a need for small committees to increase the size of their committees so that they can expand their expertise to resolve the wide variety of current issues.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14686101     DOI: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000014776.37822.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  2 in total

1.  Ethics committees identify success factors: a national survey.

Authors:  I C Schick; L Guo
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2001-12

2.  A national study of ethics committees.

Authors:  G McGee; A L Caplan; J P Spanogle; D A Asch
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.229

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Criteria for determining the appropriate method for an ethics consultation.

Authors:  Martin L Smith; Annette K Bisanz; Ana J Kempfer; Barbie Adams; Toya G Candelari; Roxann K Blackburn
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-06

2.  Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia.

Authors:  A Borovecki; H ten Have; S Oresković
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The changing composition of a hospital ethics committee: a tertiary care center's experience.

Authors:  Andrew Courtwright; Sharon Brackett; Alexandra Cist; M Cornelia Cremens; Eric L Krakauer; Ellen M Robinson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-03

4.  Clinical ethics and the dynamics of group decision-making: applying the psychological data to decisions made by ethics committees.

Authors:  Erica K Rangel
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2009-06

5.  The functioning of hospital ethics committees: a multiple-case study of four Canadian committees.

Authors:  Alice Gaudine; Marianne Lamb; Sandra M Lefort; Linda Thorne
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2011-09

6.  CLINICAL ETHICS COMMITTEES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: TOWARDS EVALUATION.

Authors:  Laura Williamson; Sheila McLean; Judith Connell
Journal:  Med Law Int       Date:  2007-02-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.