Literature DB >> 23709338

Quality in ethics consultations.

Gerard Magill1.   

Abstract

There is an increasing need for quality in ethics consultations, though there have been significant achievements in the United States and Europe. However, fundamental concerns that place the profession in jeopardy are discussed from the perspective of the U.S. in a manner that will be helpful for other countries. The descriptive component of the essay (the first two points) explains the achievements in ethics quality (illustrated by the IntegratedEthics program of the Veterans Health Administration) and the progress on standards and competencies for ethics consultations (represented by the Core Competencies of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities). Based on these achievements, the analytical component of the essay (the final three points) identifies and seeks to resolve three fundamental concerns (with increasing levels of importance) that compromise quality in ethics consultations: standards of quality; professionalism; and credentialing. The analysis argues for clearer standards of quality in ethics consultation and urges further professionalism by explaining the need for the following: interpreting the ASBH core competencies in a normative manner, developing a Code of Ethics, and clarifying the meaning of best practices. However, the most serious concern that threatens quality in ethics consultations is the lack of a credentialing process. This concern can be resolved effectively by developing an independent Ethics Consultation Accreditation Council to accredit and standardize graduate degree programs, fellowship experiences, and qualifying examinations. This credentialing process is indispensable if we are to strategically enhance quality in ethics consultations.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23709338     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-013-9489-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  63 in total

1.  "Facilitated consensus," "ethics facilitation," and unsettled cases.

Authors:  Mark R Aulisio
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2011

2.  Can UK clinical ethics committees improve quality of care?

Authors:  Leah McClimans; Anne-Marie Slowther; Michael Parker
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-06

3.  Implementing clinical ethics in German hospitals: content, didactics and evaluation of a nationwide postgraduate training programme.

Authors:  Andrea Dörries; Alfred Simon; Gerald Neitzke; Jochen Vollmann
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Ethics and the structures of health care in the European countries in transition: hospital ethics committees in Croatia.

Authors:  Ana Borovecki; Stjepan Oresković; Henk ten Have
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-23

5.  Physicians' access to ethics support services in four European countries.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Stella Reiter-Theil; Arnaud Perrier; Reidun Forde; Anne-Marie Slowther; Renzo Pegoraro; Marion Danis
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

6.  Ethics consultation and "facilitated" consensus.

Authors:  David M Adams
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2009

7.  Integrating ethics and patient safety: the role of clinical ethics consultants in quality improvement.

Authors:  Douglas J Opel; Dena Brownstein; Douglas S Diekema; Benjamin S Wilfond; Robert A Pearlman
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2009

8.  The clinical ethics consultant: verifying the qualifications of a new type of practitioner in a community hospital.

Authors:  William S Andereck; J Westly McGaughey; Albert R Jonsen
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

9.  Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation.

Authors:  M P Aulisio; R M Arnold; S J Youngner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-07-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Conceptualizing and Fostering the Quality of CES Through a Dutch National Network on CES (NEON).

Authors:  Laura Hartman; Guy Widdershoven; Eva van Baarle; Froukje Weidema; Bert Molewijk
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2021-01-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.