Literature DB >> 11950187

Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review.

T Justin Clark1, Christopher H Mann, Neil Shah, Khalid S Khan, Fujian Song, Janesh K Gupta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in diagnosing endometrial cancer in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
DESIGN: A systematic quantitative review of published research.
METHODS: Studies were selected if accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy was estimated compared with a reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by pooled likelihood ratios for positive and negative test results. There were 1013 subjects in 13 diagnostic evaluations reported in 11 primary studies.
RESULTS: A positive test result on outpatient biopsy diagnosed endometrial cancer with a pooled likelihood ratio of 66.48 (95% CI 30.04-147.13) while a negative test result had a pooled likelihood ratio of 0.14 (95% CI 0.08-0.27). The post test probability of endometrial cancer was 81.7% (95% CI 59.7%-92.9%) for a positive test and 0.9% (95% CI 0.4%-2.4%) for a negative test.
CONCLUSION: Outpatient endometrial biopsy has a high overall accuracy in diagnosing endometrial cancer when an adequate specimen is obtained. A positive test result is more accurate for ruling in disease than a negative test result is for ruling it out. Therefore, in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding where symptoms persist despite negative biopsy, further evaluation will be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11950187     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  37 in total

1.  A new diagnostic test for endometrial cancer?: Cytology analysis of sonohysterography distention media.

Authors:  Onur Guralp; Susan M Sheridan; Josephine Harter; James Louis Hinshaw; Songwon Seo; Ellen M Hartenbach; Steven Lindheim; Sarah Stewart; David M Kushner
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  The value of hysteroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps.

Authors:  Daniel Spadoto-Dias; Flávia Neves Bueloni-Dias; Leonardo Vieira Elias; Nilton José Leite; Waldir Pereira Modotti; Ricardo Bassil Lasmar; Rogério Dias
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-07

Review 3.  A critical assessment of morcellation and its impact on gynecologic surgery and the limitations of the existing literature.

Authors:  Fong W Liu; Valerie B Galvan-Turner; Krista S Pfaendler; Teresa C Longoria; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Genetic analysis of uterine aspirates improves the diagnostic value and captures the intra-tumor heterogeneity of endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Alba Mota; Eva Colás; Pablo García-Sanz; Irene Campoy; Alejandro Rojo-Sebastián; Sonia Gatius; Ángel García; Luis Chiva; Sonsoles Alonso; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Xavier González-Tallada; Berta Díaz-Feijoo; August Vidal; Patrycja Ziober-Malinowska; Marcin Bobiński; Rafael López-López; Miguel Abal; Jaume Reventós; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Gema Moreno-Bueno
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Preoperative predictors of endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or complex atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Monica Hagan Vetter; Blair Smith; Jason Benedict; Erinn M Hade; Kristin Bixel; Larry J Copeland; David E Cohn; Jeffrey M Fowler; David O'Malley; Ritu Salani; Floor J Backes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Multiple atypical polypoid adenomyoma of the uterus.

Authors:  Masahiro Horikawa; Hiroshi Shinmoto; Shigeyoshi Soga; Eisuke Shiomi; Kiguna Sei; Hideyuki Shimazaki; Tatsumi Kaji
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 7.  Circulating Transcripts and Biomarkers in Uterine Tumors: Is There a Predictive Role?

Authors:  Christine De Bruyn; Thaïs Baert; Thierry Van den Bosch; An Coosemans
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Endometrial cancer with congenital uterine anomalies: 3 case reports and a literature review.

Authors:  Jinping Gao; Jintian Zhang; Wenyan Tian; Fei Teng; Huiying Zhang; Xuhong Zhang; Yingmei Wang; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  Improvement of endometrial biopsy over transvaginal ultrasound alone for endometrial surveillance in women with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Lotte H M Gerritzen; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Angèle L M Oei; Fokko M Nagengast; Maaike A P C van Ham; Leon F A G Massuger; Joanne A de Hullu
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  A meta-analysis of the accuracy of prostate cancer studies which use magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Peng Wang; You-min Guo; Min Liu; Yong-qian Qiang; Xiao-juan Guo; Yi-li Zhang; Xiao-Yi Duan; Qiu-Juan Zhang; Weifeng Liang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.