| Literature DB >> 27638896 |
Daniel Spadoto-Dias1, Flávia Neves Bueloni-Dias2, Leonardo Vieira Elias2, Nilton José Leite2, Waldir Pereira Modotti3, Ricardo Bassil Lasmar4, Rogério Dias2.
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated that the combination of hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy is more accurate in differentiating endometrial polyps from endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. However, blind biopsy not always confirms hysteroscopic findings due to high rates of inadequate or insufficient material. The objective of this clinical, prospective, and comparative study was to establish a correlation between the histological results of office-based endometrial biopsies (hysteroscopically guided and blind) with the surgical polypectomy specimens. We evaluated 82 patients with hysteroscopic diagnosis of endometrial polyp, who randomly underwent hysteroscopically guided biopsy or blind biopsy, referred for surgical resection. A total of 36 women (43.9%) underwent hysteroscopically guided biopsy and 46 women (56.1%) underwent blind biopsy. The sensitivity of hysteroscopically guided biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial polyps ranged between 35.3 and 36.8%, when carried out at the apex and base of the lesion, compared with 29.2% for blind biopsy. Specificity was 33.3, 50, and 60%, respectively, for each biopsy. The positive predictive values were 75, 77.8, and 87.5%, and negative predictive values were 8.3, 14.3, and 8.1% respectively, compared with surgical polypectomy specimens. The office-based endometrial biopsies had low diagnostic accuracy for endometrial polyps compared with surgical polypectomy specimens.Entities:
Keywords: Biopsy or diagnosis or methods; histology; histology or diagnosis; hysteroscopy; polyps or anatomy
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27638896 PMCID: PMC5373274 DOI: 10.1177/1745505716653695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Womens Health (Lond) ISSN: 1745-5057