Literature DB >> 11929202

Minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of intervertebral disk herniation.

Hallett H Mathews1, Brenda H Long.   

Abstract

Hemilaminectomy with diskectomy, the original surgical option to address intervertebral disk herniation, was superseded by open microdiskectomy, a less invasive technique recognized as the surgical benchmark with which minimally invasive spine surgery techniques have been compared as they have been developed. These minimally invasive surgical techniques for patients with herniated nucleus pulposus and radiculopathy include laser disk decompression, arthroscopic microdiskectomy, laparoscopic techniques, foraminal endoscopy, and microendoscopic diskectomy. Each has its own complications and requires a long learning curve to develop familiarity with the technique. Patient selection, and especially disk morphology, are the most important factors in choice of technique. The optimal candidate has a previously untreated single-level herniation with limited migration or sequestration of free fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11929202     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200203000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  9 in total

1.  Magnetic nanoparticle temperature estimation.

Authors:  John B Weaver; Adam M Rauwerdink; Eric W Hansen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Treatment of lumbar disc herniations by interventional fluoroscopy-guided endoscopy.

Authors:  Juergen Reul
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 3.  Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Choll W Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Improvements in Back and Leg Pain Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Philip K Louie; Nathaniel W Jenkins; James M Parrish; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10

5.  Experience of using a 3-blade LES-Tri retractor over 5 years for lumbar decompression microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Jason A Seale; Frank K Pencle
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-07

Review 6.  Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy with general versus local anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James Mooney; Nicholas Erickson; Arsalaan Salehani; Nick Laskay; Anil Mahavadi; Adeel Ilyas; Bipul Mainali; Nitin Agarwal; Jakub Godzik
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-05-30

7.  Improvements in Back and Leg Pain After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; Dil V Patel; Daniel D Bohl; Philip K Louie; Gregory D Lopez; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-02-22

8.  Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: a three-year review from one center.

Authors:  K N Acharya; T S Senthil Nathan; J Renjit Kumar; K Venugopal Menon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy at the L5-S1 level.

Authors:  Seong Son; Yong Ahn; Sang Gu Lee; Woo Kyung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.