Literature DB >> 33184122

Improvements in Back and Leg Pain Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Dustin H Massel1, Benjamin C Mayo1, Ankur S Narain1, Fady Y Hijji1, Philip K Louie1, Nathaniel W Jenkins1, James M Parrish1, Kern Singh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvement in patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is poorly defined. As such, the purpose of this study was to quantify improvements in Visual Analogue Scale back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental and Physical Composite scores following MIS-TLIF.
METHODS: A surgical registry of patients who underwent primary 1-level MIS-TLIF during 2014-2015 was reviewed. Comparisons of Visual Analogue Scale back and leg pain, ODI, and Short Form-12 Mental and Physical Composite scores were performed using paired t tests from preoperative to each postoperative time point. Analysis of variance was used to estimate the degree of improvement in back and leg pain over the first postoperative year. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients presenting with predominant back (pBP) or leg (pLP) pain. Multivariate linear regression was performed to compare patient-reported outcome scores by subgroup.
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were identified. Visual Analogue Scale back and leg scores, and ODI improved from preoperative scores at all postoperative time points (P < .05 for each). Patients with pBP (n = 68) and patients with pLP (n = 38) reported reductions in both back and leg pain over the first postoperative year (P < .05 for each). In the pBP cohort, patients experienced significant reductions in ODI after the first 6 postoperative weeks (P < .05 for each). In the pLP cohort, patients experienced significant reductions in ODI throughout the first postoperative year (P < .05 for each). Patients with pLP and pBP experienced similar reductions in back pain, whereas patients with pLP experienced significantly greater reductions in leg pain at all postoperative time points (P < .05 for each).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests patients experience significant improvements in back and leg pain following MIS-TLIF regardless of predominant symptom. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results can assist surgeons when counseling their patients on the magnitude of symptom improvement they may experience following MIS-TLIF. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2020 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oswestry Disability Index; Short Form-12; Visual Analogue Scale; back pain; leg pain; minimally invasive spine surgery; patient-reported outcomes; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33184122      PMCID: PMC7671435          DOI: 10.14444/7107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  43 in total

1.  Perioperative results following open and minimally invasive single-level lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Peter Lee; John C Liu; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R B Keller; D Robson; R A Deyo; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Kaveh Khajavi; Alessandria Y Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Investigation of clinically important benefit of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Anthony L Asher; Saniya S Godil; Clinton J Devin; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Patient satisfaction after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is primarily driven by relieving pain.

Authors:  Christian Hessler; Katharina Boysen; Jan Regelsberger; Eik Vettorazzi; Dietrich Winkler; Manfred Westphal
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Kelly R Bratcher; Chelsea E Canan; Lauren O Burke; Mladen Djurasovic; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-16

9.  Comparison of early and late percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Hongwei Wang; Bo Huang; Wenjie Zheng; Changqing Li; Zhengfeng Zhang; Jian Wang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Measuring surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: assessment of minimum clinically important difference.

Authors:  Brenda M Auffinger; Rishi R Lall; Nader S Dahdaleh; Albert P Wong; Sandi K Lam; Tyler Koski; Richard G Fessler; Zachary A Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?

Authors:  Kyle W Morse; Ram K Alluri; Avani S Vaishnav; Hikari Urakawa; Jung Kee Mok; Sohrab S Virk; Evan D Sheha; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Meeting Patient Expectations or Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Predictors of Satisfaction among Lumbar Fusion Patients.

Authors:  Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-09-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.