Literature DB >> 11927350

On the delay in processing high spatial frequency visual information: reaction time and VEP latency study of the effect of local intensity of stimulation.

Angel Vassilev1, Milena Mihaylova, Claude Bonnet.   

Abstract

Saleh and Bonnet [Fechner Day 98, p. 344] have shown that, upon parafoveal stimulation and up to 6.5 c/deg, reaction time (RT) is a function of grating contrast multiplied by grating period. The present experiments extend these findings to foveal stimulation within a wider spatial-frequency (SF) range and to stimuli of different duration. Both RT and latency of visually evoked potentials (VEP) were measured. The findings might be explained by the following assumption: Most RT and VEP latency variations across the SF range are a result of local intensity factors (retinal contrast and width of grating bars). Residual RT variations were found that might be due to processing of high SFs by slower mechanisms than those processing low and medium SFs.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11927350     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00300-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Temporal summation and reaction times for detecting gratings.

Authors:  D L Mitov; Ts T Totev
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05

2.  Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed by using classification images.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Estimation of temporal resolution of object identification in human vision.

Authors:  Risto Näsänen; Helena Ojanpää; Topi Tanskanen; Juha Päällysaho
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of Stimulus Size and Contrast on the Initial Primary Visual Cortical Response in Humans.

Authors:  Nigel Gebodh; M Isabel Vanegas; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Victor Rodriguez-Lopez; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Effects of spatial frequency on visual evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Aki Tsuruhara; Yuko Nagata; Masaya Suzuki; Koji Inui; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Low-contrast Pattern-reversal Visual Evoked Potential in Different Spatial Frequencies.

Authors:  Homa Hassankarimi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Alireza Mohammadi; Seyed Mohammad Reza Noori
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2020-08-06

8.  "Slight" of hand: the processing of visually degraded gestures with speech.

Authors:  Spencer D Kelly; Bruce C Hansen; David T Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Delayed Correction for Extrapolation in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Meng Liao; Yutong Song; Longqian Liu; Alexandre Reynaud
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  High-gamma oscillations precede visual steady-state responses: A human electrocorticography study.

Authors:  Benjamin Wittevrongel; Elvira Khachatryan; Evelien Carrette; Paul Boon; Alfred Meurs; Dirk Van Roost; Marc M Van Hulle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.