Literature DB >> 11926118

A dual-mode dynamic model of the human accommodation system.

Madjid Khosroyani1, George K Hung.   

Abstract

The function of the accommodation system is to provide a clear retinal image of objects in the visual scene. The system was previously thought to be under simple continuous (i.e., single mode of operation) feedback control, but recent research has shown that it is under discontinuous (i.e., two stimulus-dependent modes of operation) feedback control by means of fast and slow processes. A model using MATLAB/SIMULINK was developed to simulate this dual-mode behavior. It consists of fast and slow components in a feedback loop. The fast component responds to step target disparity with an open-loop movement to nearly reach the desired level, and then the slow component uses closed-loop feedback to reduce the residual error to an acceptable small level. For slow ramps, the slow component provides smooth tracking of the stimulus, whereas for fast ramps, the fast component provides accurate staircase-like step responses. Simulation of this model using a variety of stimuli, including pulse, step, ramp, and sinusoid, showed good agreement with experimental results. Thus, this represents the first dynamic model of accommodation that can accurately simulate the complex dual-mode behavior seen experimentally. The biological significance of this model is that it can be used to quantitatively analyze clinical deficits such as amblyopia and accommodative insufficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11926118     DOI: 10.1006/bulm.2001.0274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  6 in total

1.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Control at stability's edge minimizes energetic costs: expert stick balancing.

Authors:  John Milton; Ryan Meyer; Max Zhvanetsky; Sarah Ridge; Tamás Insperger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Short-term adaptive modification of dynamic ocular accommodation.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Indu Vedamurthy; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effect of temporal location of correction of monochromatic aberrations on the dynamic accommodation response.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Sem Sem Chin; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Dynamics of eye movements under time varying stimuli.

Authors:  Verica Radisavljevic-Gajic
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 0.957

6.  Seeing the future: Predictive control in neural models of ocular accommodation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Christos Kaspiris-Rousellis; Toby S Wood; Bing Wu; Björn N S Vlaskamp; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.004

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.