Literature DB >> 19255153

Short-term adaptive modification of dynamic ocular accommodation.

Shrikant R Bharadwaj1, Indu Vedamurthy, Clifton M Schor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Indirect observations suggest that the neural control of accommodation may undergo adaptive recalibration in response to age-related biomechanical changes in the accommodative system. However, there has been no direct demonstration of such an adaptive capability. This investigation was conducted to demonstrate short-term adaptation of accommodative step response dynamics to optically induced changes in neuromuscular demands.
METHODS: Repetitive changes in accommodative effort were induced in 15 subjects (18-34 years) with a double-step adaptation paradigm wherein an initial 2-D step change in blur was followed 350 ms later by either a 2-D step increase in blur (increasing-step paradigm) or a 1.75-D step decrease in blur (decreasing-step paradigm). Peak velocity, peak acceleration, and latency of 2-D single-step test responses were assessed before and after 1.5 hours of training with these paradigms.
RESULTS: Peak velocity and peak acceleration of 2-D step responses increased after adaptation to the increasing-step paradigm (9/12 subjects), and they decreased after adaptation to the decreasing-step paradigm (4/9 subjects). Adaptive changes in peak velocity and peak acceleration generalized to responses that were smaller (1 D) and larger (3 D) than the 2-D adaptation stimulus. The magnitude of adaptation correlated poorly with the subject's age, but it was significantly negatively correlated with the preadaptation dynamics. Response latency decreased after adaptation, irrespective of the direction of adaptation.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-term adaptive changes in accommodative step response dynamics could be induced, at least in some of our subjects between 18 and 34 years, with a directional bias toward increasing rather than decreasing the dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255153      PMCID: PMC2714044          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  45 in total

1.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The Glenn A. Fry invited lecture. Accommodation to gratings and more naturalistic stimuli.

Authors:  K J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Edinger--Westphal stimulated accommodative dynamics in anesthetized, middle-aged rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Martin Baumeister; Mark Wendt; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 5.  Neuronal circuitry controlling the near response.

Authors:  L E Mays; P D Gamlin
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye. Changes in the anterior segment and crystalline lens with focus.

Authors:  J F Koretz; C A Cook; P L Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity.

Authors:  C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Objective assessment of accommodation orthoptics. I. Dynamic insufficiency.

Authors:  J S Liu; M Lee; J Jang; K J Ciuffreda; J H Wong; D Grisham; L Stark
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1979-05

9.  In vivo videography of the rhesus monkey accommodative apparatus. Age-related loss of ciliary muscle response to central stimulation.

Authors:  M W Neider; K Crawford; P L Kaufman; L Z Bito
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-01

10.  Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude.

Authors:  Jon E Wold; Annie Hu; Stephanie Chen; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  4 in total

1.  Treatment of accommodative dysfunction in children: results from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mitchell Scheiman; Susan Cotter; Marjean Taylor Kulp; G Lynn Mitchell; Jeffrey Cooper; Michael Gallaway; Kristine B Hopkins; Mary Bartuccio; Ida Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Short-term adaptation of accommodation, accommodative vergence and disparity vergence facility.

Authors:  James Maxwell; Jianliang Tong; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effect of temporal location of correction of monochromatic aberrations on the dynamic accommodation response.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Sem Sem Chin; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Pupil Tracking for Real-Time Motion Corrected Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Derek Nankivil; Christian Viehland; Brenton Keller; Joseph A Izatt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.