Literature DB >> 11923600

Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial.

Mario Prandi1, Rita Lionetto, Antonio Bini, Gianfranco Francioni, Giuseppe Accarpio, Antonio Anfossi, Ezio Ballario, Giuseppe Becchi, Stefano Bonilauri, Andrea Carobbi, Paolo Cavaliere, Domenico Garcea, Lucio Giuliani, Eugenio Morziani, Franco Mosca, Antonio Mussa, Massimo Pasqualini, Domenico Poddie, Federico Tonetti, Luciano Zardo, Riccardo Rosso.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the extent of lymphadenectomy (number of recovered lymph nodes) was associated with long-term outcome in patients operated on for stage B and C colon cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Lymphatic spreading is the main prognostic indicator in colon cancer patients, although the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy and its prognostic impact are still unknown.
METHODS: In 3,648 patients (median follow-up 3.6 years) enrolled in two consecutive INTACC multicentric trials on adjuvant therapy for colon cancer, we studied the association of the number of recovered nodes with overall survival and relapse free survival by means of univariate and Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: The worst overall survival was related to ages > 65 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.30), higher grading (RR = 1.96). Better overall survival was related to female gender (RR = 0.80) and to higher number of recovered nodes (8-12 nodes, RR = 0.46, 13-17 nodes, RR = 0.76, nodes > or = 18, RR = 0.79). The same pattern was observed for relapse free survival. Longer overall and relapse free survival were related to a higher number of recovered nodes with P =.034 and P =.003 respectively (stratified analysis for absence or presence of positive nodes). Stage B patients with fewer than 7 nodes in the specimen had both shorter overall survival (P =.0000) and relapse free survival (P =.0016) than the other B patients. Outcome of stage C patients was not related to the number of recovered nodes (P =.28 and 0.12 respectively). The interaction test between stage of disease and number of recovered nodes was statistically significant (P =.017).
CONCLUSIONS: Stage B patients with a small number of examined nodes may be understaged. Thus, these patients might be considered for adjuvant therapy because of their poorer life expectancy than other stage B patients. For stage C patients, the number of recovered nodes does not seem to affect long-term outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923600      PMCID: PMC1422459          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200204000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  10 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  V B ASTLER; F A COLLER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT).

Authors:  L P Fielding; P A Arsenault; P H Chapuis; O Dent; B Gathright; J D Hardcastle; P Hermanek; J R Jass; R C Newland
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.029

3.  Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  H Nelson; N Petrelli; A Carlin; J Couture; J Fleshman; J Guillem; B Miedema; D Ota; D Sargent
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; R Severino; M B Honnebier; P Tom; T S Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer.

Authors:  P H Chapuis; O F Dent; R Fisher; R C Newland; M T Pheils; E Smyth; K Colquhoun
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis.

Authors:  S Caplin; J P Cerottini; F T Bosman; M T Constanda; J C Givel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  F Hernanz; S Revuelta; C Redondo; C Madrazo; J Castillo; M Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Prognostic significance of location of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H Shida; K Ban; M Matsumoto; K Masuda; T Imanari; T Machida; T Yamamoto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance.

Authors:  K W Scott; R H Grace
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  90 in total

Review 1.  Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas and sentinel nodes.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Lymph node harvest in colon and rectal cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  James R McDonald; Andrew G Renehan; Sarah T O'Dwyer; Najib Y Haboubi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-27

3.  Prognostic factors in node-negative colorectal cancer: a retrospective study from a prospective database.

Authors:  Gregoire Desolneux; Pascal Burtin; Emilie Lermite; Roberto Bergamaschi; Antoine Hamy; Jean Pierre Arnaud
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Can adequate lymphadenectomy be obtained by laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer? Results of a case-control study in 200 patients.

Authors:  Samer Sara; Gilles Poncet; David Voirin; Marie-Hélène Laverriere; Daniel Anglade; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Nodal yield of neck dissections and influence on outcome in laryngectomized patients.

Authors:  Arne Böttcher; Steffen Dommerich; Steffen Sander; Heidi Olze; Carmen Stromberger; Annekatrin Coordes; Nate Jowett; Steffen Knopke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer and adequate lymphadenectomy: association between survival and number of lymph nodes.

Authors:  F Polignano; N Henderson; S-M Alishahi; A Zito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Lymph node yield after colectomy for cancer: is absence of mismatch repair a factor?

Authors:  Tushar Samdani; Molly Schultheis; Zsofia Stadler; Jinru Shia; Tiffany Fancher; Justine Misholy; Martin R Weiser; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Nodal staging score: a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer.

Authors:  Mithat Gönen; Deborah Schrag; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Non-surgical factors influencing lymph node yield in colon cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Wood; Colin Peirce; Jurgen Mulsow
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.