Literature DB >> 11916663

Activity and diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer.

Jutta Kleikemper1, Martin H Schroth, William V Sigler, Martina Schmucki, Stefano M Bernasconi, Josef Zeyer.   

Abstract

Microbial sulfate reduction is an important metabolic activity in petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC)-contaminated aquifers. We quantified carbon source-enhanced microbial SO(4)(2-) reduction in a PHC-contaminated aquifer by using single-well push-pull tests and related the consumption of sulfate and added carbon sources to the presence of certain genera of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). We also used molecular methods to assess suspended SRB diversity. In four consecutive tests, we injected anoxic test solutions (1,000 liters) containing bromide as a conservative tracer, sulfate, and either propionate, butyrate, lactate, or acetate as reactants into an existing monitoring well. After an initial incubation period, 1,000 liters of test solution-groundwater mixture was extracted from the same well. Average total test duration was 71 h. We measured concentrations of bromide, sulfate, and carbon sources in native groundwater as well as in injection and extraction phase samples and characterized the SRB population by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Enhanced sulfate reduction concomitant with carbon source degradation was observed in all tests. Computed first-order rate coefficients ranged from 0.19 to 0.32 day(-1) for sulfate reduction and from 0.13 to 0.60 day(-1) for carbon source degradation. Sulfur isotope fractionation in unconsumed sulfate indicated that sulfate reduction was microbially mediated. Enhancement of sulfate reduction due to carbon source additions in all tests and variability of rate coefficients suggested the presence of specific SRB genera and a high diversity of SRB. We confirmed this by using FISH and DGGE. A large fraction of suspended bacteria hybridized with SRB-targeting probes SRB385 plus SRB385-Db (11 to 24% of total cells). FISH results showed that the activity of these bacteria was enhanced by addition of sulfate and carbon sources during push-pull tests. However, DGGE profiles indicated that the bacterial community structure of the dominant species did not change during the tests. Thus, the combination of push-pull tests with molecular methods provided valuable insights into microbial processes, activities, and diversity in the sulfate-reducing zone of a PHC-contaminated aquifer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11916663      PMCID: PMC123867          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1516-1523.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  22 in total

1.  Distribution of Microbial Physiologic Types in an Aquifer Contaminated by Crude Oil.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Molecular and microscopic identification of sulfate-reducing bacteria in multispecies biofilms.

Authors:  R I Amann; J Stromley; R Devereux; R Key; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a stratified fjord (Mariager Fjord, Denmark) as evaluated by most-probable-number counts and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA fragments.

Authors:  A Teske; C Wawer; G Muyzer; N B Ramsing
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology.

Authors:  G Muyzer; K Smalla
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Direct ribosome isolation from soil to extract bacterial rRNA for community analysis.

Authors:  A Felske; B Engelen; U Nübel; H Backhaus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Fate of the biological control agent Pseudomonas aureofaciens TX-1 after application to turfgrass.

Authors:  W V Sigler; C H Nakatsu; Z J Reicher; R F Turco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Carboxylation as an initial reaction in the anaerobic metabolism of naphthalene and phenanthrene by sulfidogenic consortia.

Authors:  X Zhang; L Y Young
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Fractionation of sulfur isotopes during dissimilatory reduction of sulfate by a thermophilic gram-negative bacterium at 60 degrees C

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  In situ assessment of microbial sulfate reduction in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer using push-pull tests and stable sulfur isotope analyses.

Authors:  M H Schroth; J Kleikemper; C Bolliger; S M Bernasconi; J Zeyer
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.188

10.  Desulforhabdus amnigenus gen. nov. sp. nov., a sulfate reducer isolated from anaerobic granular sludge.

Authors:  S J Oude Elferink; R N Maas; H J Harmsen; A J Stams
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.552

View more
  21 in total

1.  Community composition and functioning of denitrifying bacteria from adjacent meadow and forest soils.

Authors:  J J Rich; R S Heichen; P J Bottomley; K Cromack; D D Myrold
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Composition and diversity of microbial communities recovered from surrogate minerals incubated in an acidic uranium-contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  Catherine L Reardon; David E Cummings; Lynn M Petzke; Barry L Kinsall; David B Watson; Brent M Peyton; Gill G Geesey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evidence for aceticlastic methanogenesis in the presence of sulfate in a gas condensate-contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  Christopher G Struchtemeyer; Mostafa S Elshahed; Kathleen E Duncan; Michael J McInerney
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Phylogeography of sulfate-reducing bacteria among disturbed sediments, disclosed by analysis of the dissimilatory sulfite reductase genes (dsrAB).

Authors:  J R Pérez-Jiménez; L J Kerkhof
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Assessment of nitrification potential in ground water using short term, single-well injection experiments.

Authors:  R L Smith; L K Baumgartner; D N Miller; D A Repert; J K Böhlke
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Molecular analysis of the metabolic rates of discrete subsurface populations of sulfate reducers.

Authors:  M Miletto; K H Williams; A L N'Guessan; D R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Regime shift and microbial dynamics in a sequencing batch reactor for nitrification and anammox treatment of urine.

Authors:  Helmut Bürgmann; Sarina Jenni; Francisco Vazquez; Kai M Udert
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Dynamic of sulphate-reducing microorganisms in petroleum-contaminated marine sediments inhabited by the polychaete Hediste diversicolor.

Authors:  Magalie Stauffert; Cristiana Cravo-Laureau; Robert Duran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Diversity of bacterial communities along a petroleum contamination gradient in desert soils.

Authors:  Raeid M M Abed; Sumaiya Al-Kindi; Samiha Al-Kharusi
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  The patterns of bacterial community and relationships between sulfate-reducing bacteria and hydrochemistry in sulfate-polluted groundwater of Baogang rare earth tailings.

Authors:  Xinli An; Paul Baker; Hu Li; Jianqiang Su; Changping Yu; Chao Cai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.