Literature DB >> 11915487

Human brain potentials reveal similar processing of non-linguistic abstract structure and linguistic syntactic structure.

Taïssia Lelekov-Boissard1, Peter F Dominey.   

Abstract

This research tested the hypothesis that shared or related neurophysiological processes are required for treating (a) non-linguistic abstract structure and (b) some aspects of linguistic syntactic structure. In language, one syntactic structure can be used to create an open class of sentences. We have previously proposed a relation between this generative aspect of syntactic structure and the abstract structure of non-linguistic sequences. For instance, the sequences 'ABCBAC' and 'DEFEDF' have different serial order or serial structure, but share the same abstract structure '123213'. Our recent studies of neuropsychology, simulation and ERPs argued that similar neurophysiological processes are involved in treating non-linguistic abstract structure and certain aspects of linguistic syntactic structure. The current research tests this hypothesis by examining the ERP profile evoked during the processing of non-linguistic sequences vs. sentences. Ten healthy subjects were trained to discriminate between syntactically correct and incorrect sequences and sentences presented visually on a video screen. During the subsequent ERP recording, subjects discriminated between correct and incorrect sequences and sentences presented visually on the screen. This discrimination task yielded, for anomalies in both the abstract and syntactic conditions, a late positivity around 550 ms with partially overlapping topography. These results support our hypothesis that shared or related neurophysiological processes are required for treating non-linguistic abstract structure and aspects of linguistic syntactic structure. However, they also suggest that the overlap between these two types of processing is not complete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11915487     DOI: 10.1016/s0987-7053(01)00291-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin        ISSN: 0987-7053            Impact factor:   3.734


  5 in total

1.  The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension.

Authors:  Michelle Leckey; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Event-related potential responses to letter-string comparison analogies.

Authors:  Changquan Long; Jing Li; Antao Chen; Jiang Qiu; Jie Chen; Hong Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Prediction, cognition and the brain.

Authors:  Andreja Bubic; D Yves von Cramon; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Semantic elaboration: ERPs reveal rapid transition from novel to known.

Authors:  Patricia J Bauer; Felicia L Jackson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kourtis; Mateusz Woźniak; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.139

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.