Literature DB >> 11914790

Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass.

Charalambos Papaxanthis1, Marco Schieppati, Rodolphe Gentili, Thierry Pozzo.   

Abstract

Several experiments have suggested that similar physiological substrates are involved in movement execution and motor imagery, and that the same laws of movement control apply to both processes. Using a mental chronometry paradigm, we examined the effects of movement direction and added mass on the duration of actual and imagined movements. Six subjects executed or imagined arm movements in the sagittal and horizontal plane, in three different loading conditions: without added mass, and with an added mass of 1 and 1.5 kg. The duration of both actual and imagined movements was measured by an electronic stopwatch. The actual movements were significantly increased in duration as a function of mass, for both movement directions. However, direction per se had no effect on duration. The duration of imagined movements was very similar to that of actual movements whatever the subject and mass and direction condition. These results show that both inertial and gravitational constraints are accurately incorporated in the timing of the motor imagery process, which appears therefore to be functionally very close to the process of planning and performing the actual movement.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11914790     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1012-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Representation of virtual arm movements in precuneus.

Authors:  Christian Dohle; Klaus Martin Stephan; Jakob T Valvoda; Omid Hosseiny; Lutz Tellmann; Torsten Kuhlen; Rüdiger J Seitz; Hans-Joachim Freund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: simple approximations of complex transformations.

Authors:  Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motor imagery of locomotion with an additional load: actual load experience does not affect differences between physical and mental durations.

Authors:  Jörn Munzert; Klaus Blischke; Britta Krüger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Timing of continuous motor imagery: the two-thirds power law originates in trajectory planning.

Authors:  Matan Karklinsky; Tamar Flash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Do we use a priori knowledge of gravity when making elbow rotations?

Authors:  Ilona J Pinter; Arthur J van Soest; Maarten F Bobbert; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor imagery of tool use: relationship to actual use and adherence to Fitts’ law across tasks.

Authors:  Kristen L Macuga; Athan P Papailiou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Chronometry of mentally versus physically practiced tasks in people with stroke.

Authors:  Andy J Wu; Valerie Hermann; Jun Ying; Stephen J Page
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

9.  Tool characteristics in imagery of tool actions.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Cristina Massen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-07

10.  High loads induce differences between actual and imagined movement duration.

Authors:  Andrew B Slifkin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.