Literature DB >> 19294369

Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: simple approximations of complex transformations.

Sandra Sülzenbrück1, Herbert Heuer.   

Abstract

Learning to operate a complex tool such as a sliding lever can be conceived as learning both a kinematic and a dynamic transformation. We investigated whether the presence of the dynamic transformation has an inhibitory or a facilitative effect on learning to control a sliding lever. Furthermore, we examined the characteristics of the internal model of the kinematic transformation of the lever in visual open-loop trials. In the experiment, one group of participants practiced with only the kinematic transformation of the lever (virtual lever), the other group practiced with both the kinematic and the dynamic transformation (physical lever). Visual feedback was continuously present during practice. Results showed only marginal differences between both groups in open-loop tests. This finding is likely to be related to the fact that in both groups a simplified approximation of the kinematic transformation was acquired, in particular a symmetry approximation. With such an approximation the target for the hand movement is derived from the visual target for the tip of the lever as the position which is symmetric around a sagittal axis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19294369     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1764-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; E Nakano; H Imamizu; R Osu; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

5.  Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Function learning: induction of continuous stimulus-response relations.

Authors:  K Koh; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotations in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-03

8.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements.

Authors:  C G Atkeson; J M Hollerbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Human arm trajectory formation.

Authors:  W Abend; E Bizzi; P Morasso
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  10 in total

1.  Intra- and intermodal integration of discrepant visual and proprioceptive action effects.

Authors:  Stefan Ladwig; Christine Sutter; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The trajectory of adaptation to the visuo-motor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers.

Authors:  Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Mind and movement.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Sandra Sülzenbrück
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-08

4.  Mirrored visual feedback limits distal effect anticipation.

Authors:  Christine Sutter; Stefan Ladwig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effective part-task training as evidence of distinct adaptive processes with different time scales.

Authors:  Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of angular gain transformations between movement and visual feedback on coordination performance in unimanual circling.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Sandra Dietrich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-05

7.  Visual target distance, but not visual cursor path length produces shifts in motor behavior.

Authors:  Nike Wendker; Oliver S Sack; Christine Sutter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-17

8.  Individual differences in learning a novel discrete motor task.

Authors:  Laura Golenia; Marina M Schoemaker; Leonora J Mouton; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Eye-Hand Coordination during Visuomotor Adaptation with Different Rotation Angles: Effects of Terminal Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Sebastian Rentsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Towards mastery of complex visuo-motor transformations.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Sandra Sülzenbrück
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.