Literature DB >> 25471367

Motor imagery of locomotion with an additional load: actual load experience does not affect differences between physical and mental durations.

Jörn Munzert1, Klaus Blischke, Britta Krüger.   

Abstract

Motor imagery relies strongly on motor representations. Currently, it is widely accepted that both the imagery and execution of actions share the same neural representations (Jeannerod, Neuroimage 14:S103-S109, 2001). Comparing mental with actual movement durations opens a window through which to examine motor representations and how they relate to cognitive motor processes. The present experiment examined mental durations reported by participants standing upright who imagined walking either with or without an additional load while actually carrying or not carrying that same load. Results showed a robust effect of longer durations when imagining the additional load during mental walking, whereas physical walking with an additional load did not extend movement durations accordingly. However, experiencing an actual load during imagery did not influence mental durations substantially. This dissociation of load-related effects can be interpreted as being due to an interaction of motor processes and their cognitive representation along with a reduction in neural activity in vestibular and somatosensory areas during imagery of locomotion. It is argued that this effect might be specific to locomotion and not generalize to a broader range of movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25471367     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4156-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Abnormalities of imaged motor sequences in children with developmental coordination disorder.

Authors:  P Maruff; P Wilson; M Trebilcock; J Currie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

3.  Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action.

Authors:  J A Stevens
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01-05

Review 4.  Biological pattern generation: the cellular and computational logic of networks in motion.

Authors:  Sten Grillner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Floris P de Lange; Rick C Helmich; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Role of working memory in transformation of visual and motor representations for use in mental simulation.

Authors:  Carl Gabbard; Jihye Lee; Priscila Caçola
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.065

7.  Effect of a fatiguing protocol on motor imagery accuracy.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Marianne Haguenauer; André Dittmar; Christian Collet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man.

Authors:  J Decety; M Jeannerod; D Durozard; G Baverel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Th Mulder
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Does Motor Simulation Theory Explain the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Motor Imagery? A Critical Review.

Authors:  Helen O'Shea; Aidan Moran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Motor Imagery as a Function of Disease Severity in Multiple Sclerosis: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Andrea Tacchino; Catarina Saiote; Giampaolo Brichetto; Giulia Bommarito; Luca Roccatagliata; Christian Cordano; Mario A Battaglia; Gian L Mancardi; Matilde Inglese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Task-Specificity of Muscular Responses During Motor Imagery: Peripheral Physiological Effects and the Legacy of Edmund Jacobson.

Authors:  Jörn Munzert; Britta Krüger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.