Literature DB >> 11913237

[Porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant. Prospective study of 75 primary implantations].

E Van Acker1, P De Potter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the incidence of orbital complications in patients who underwent primary placement of a porous polyethylene implant (Medpor) after enucleation. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Prospective non randomized case series of 75 consecutive patients in whom a porous polyethylene (PP) spherical implant wrapped with homologous sclera was implanted after enucleation.
RESULTS: The mean age at the time of enucleation was 42.7 years (range, 1.4 to 80 years). The histopathological diagnoses after enucleation included uveal melanoma in 28 patients, retinoblastoma in 11 patients, phthisis bulbi in 23 patients, neovascular glaucoma in 5 patients, endophthalmitis in 3 patients, ruptured traumatic globe in 2 patients, microphthalmos in two patients, and medulloepithelioma in one patient. Thirty-four patients (45%) had had prior ocular surgery. The prosthesis was fitted after a mean interval of 4.5 weeks (range, 3 to 10 weeks). After a mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 3 to 33 months), there was one case (1%) of conjunctival dehiscence with material exposure secondary to massive postoperative orbital hemorrhage 2 weeks after enucleation. There was no case of orbital cellulitis, implant extrusion, or significant inflammatory response. No PP implant was drilled for peg placement. DISCUSSION-
CONCLUSIONS: The anteriorly wrapped porous polyethylene orbital (Medpor) sphere appears to be well tolerated by all age groups with no major complication in primary implantation after enucleation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11913237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol        ISSN: 0181-5512            Impact factor:   0.818


  8 in total

1.  Autogenous temporalis fascia patch graft for porous polyethylene (Medpor) sphere orbital implant exposure.

Authors:  M S Sagoo; J M Olver
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Amniotic membrane transplantation for porous sphere orbital implant exposure.

Authors:  Yan-hong Chen; Hong-guang Cui
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  [Porous orbital implants].

Authors:  B Cleres; H W Meyer-Rüsenberg
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Integrated versus non-integrated orbital implants for treating anophthalmic sockets.

Authors:  Silvana Schellini; Regina El Dib; Leandro Re Silva; Joyce G Farat; Yuqing Zhang; Eliane C Jorge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-07

5.  The effect of cancer therapies on pediatric anophthalmic sockets.

Authors:  Yevgeniy Shildkrot; Maria Kirzhner; Barrett G Haik; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew W Wilson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  High density porous polyethylene material (Medpor) as an unwrapped orbital implant.

Authors:  Yan-hong Chen; Hong-guang Cui
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  The use of porous polyethylene (Medpor) lower eyelid spacers in lid heightening and stabilisation.

Authors:  J Tan; J Olver; M Wright; R Maini; C Neoh; A J Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 8.  Survey on the management of orbital and intraocular tumors among oculofacial surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Priscilla Xinhui Wang; Victor Teck Chang Koh; Katherine Lun; Gangadhara Sundar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.