Literature DB >> 11909882

Avoidance and accommodation of surface height changes by healthy, community-dwelling, young, and elderly men.

Bradford J McFadyen1, François Prince.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare avoidance and accommodation strategies during gait between healthy, community-dwelling, young and elderly males. Ten young (28.4 +/- 5.4 years) and ten elderly (69.5 +/- 6.1 years) males were tested while walking on the level, avoiding a 11.75-cm-high obstacle, and accommodating a change in floor height of 11.75 cm. Three dimensional, kinematic, and kinetic analyses were performed bilaterally. Both age groups used the same general sagittal plane strategies in order to avoid and accommodate the obstructions, but the elderly group had significantly reduced lead toe clearances. These riskier toe clearances by the elderly group were found to be due to limited, frontal plane pelvic motion, shorter stride lengths, and subtle differences in the interplay of lower limb energetic patterns within the sagittal plane. These results are discussed with respect to diminishing physical capacity in the elderly populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11909882     DOI: 10.1093/gerona/57.4.b166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci        ISSN: 1079-5006            Impact factor:   6.053


  19 in total

1.  Age-related changes in avoidance strategies when negotiating single and multiple obstacles.

Authors:  Catherine R Lowrey; Ashley Watson; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task.

Authors:  Kari L Loverro; Nicole M Mueske; Kate A Hamel
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The weight-bearing rate on the paretic limb of cerebrovascular hemiplegic patients necessary for an independent obstacle negotiation gait.

Authors:  Yoshiteru Akezaki; Shunichi Yasuda; Katumi Hamaoka; Yoshinobu Yoshimoto; Susumu Yoshimura; Takuo Nomura; Hiroshi Yamasaki; Atushi Sato
Journal:  J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Predictability and Robustness in the Manipulation of Dynamically Complex Objects.

Authors:  Dagmar Sternad; Christopher J Hasson
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Visuospatial working memory and obstacle crossing in young and older people.

Authors:  N C W Chu; D L Sturnieks; S R Lord; J C Menant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  The effects of shoe traction and obstacle height on lower extremity coordination dynamics during walking.

Authors:  Leslie Decker; Jeremy J Houser; John M Noble; Gregory M Karst; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Does osteoporosis predispose falls? A study on obstacle avoidance and balance confidence.

Authors:  Ellen Smulders; Wim van Lankveld; Roland Laan; Jacques Duysens; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Age-related and obstacle height-related differences in movements while stepping over obstacles.

Authors:  Sohee Shin; Shinichi Demura; Tsuneo Watanabe; Tamotsu Yabumoto; Bateer Shi; Naoki Sakakibara; Toshio Matsuoka
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.867

9.  Ground Reaction Forces of the Lead and Trail Limbs when Stepping Over an Obstacle.

Authors:  Sunee Bovonsunthonchai; Fuengfa Khobkhun; Roongtiwa Vachalathiti
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-07-14

10.  Gait Pattern Alterations during Walking, Texting and Walking and Texting during Cognitively Distractive Tasks while Negotiating Common Pedestrian Obstacles.

Authors:  Sammy Licence; Robynne Smith; Miranda P McGuigan; Conrad P Earnest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.