Literature DB >> 36112172

Visuospatial working memory and obstacle crossing in young and older people.

N C W Chu1, D L Sturnieks1,2, S R Lord1,3, J C Menant4,5.   

Abstract

Obstacle crossing requires visuospatial working memory to guide the trailing leg trajectory when vision in unavailable. Visuospatial working memory, as assessed with neuropsychological tests, declines with age, however, this remains to be investigated functionally in obstacle crossing. There is also evidence that visuospatial encoding during a secondary task interferes with balance control during stepping and walking in older people. Here, we studied the interaction effects of age by delay (study 1) and age by secondary visuospatial task (study 2) conditions on obstacle clearance in a visuospatial working memory -guided obstacle crossing task. Healthy young adults aged 19 to 36 years (n = 20 in study 1 and n = 17 in study 2) and healthy older adults aged 66 to 83 years (n = 29 in study 1 and n = 21 in study 2) were instructed to step over an obstacle with their leading leg and straddle it for a delay period before completing the crossing with their trailing leg. In study 1, two obstacle height conditions (12 cm, 18 cm) and two delay durations (20 s, 60 s) were presented in random order. In study 2, participants were required to attend to either no secondary task (control), a visuospatial secondary (star movement) task, or a nonspatial secondary (arithmetic) task, while straddling the obstacle for a delay duration of 20 s, at obstacle heights of 12 cm and 18 cm, randomly presented. Trailing leg kinematics (mean and variability of maximum toe clearance over the obstacle) were determined via motion capture. There were no statistically significant age by delay or age by secondary task interactions. In study 1, toe clearance variability was significantly greater in young adults and increased with increasing delay duration in both groups. In study 2, compared with the control condition, toe clearance variability was significantly greater in the non-spatial secondary task condition but not in the visuospatial condition. Contrary to our hypotheses, these findings suggest that young and older adults alike can store an obstacle representation via visuospatial working memory for durations of at least 60 s and use this information to safely scale their trailing leg over an obstacle. However, the increase in trailing leg toe clearance variability with delay duration suggests that obstacle representation starts to deteriorate even within the first 20 s regardless of age. The finding that undertaking a concurrent arithmetic task impaired visuospatial working memory-guided obstacle clearance suggests a potential increased risk of tripping during obstacle crossing while dual-tasking in both young and older people.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Obstacle avoidance; Secondary task; Visuospatial processing; Working memory

Year:  2022        PMID: 36112172     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06458-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  69 in total

1.  Is the prioritization of postural control altered in conditions of postural threat in younger and older adults?

Authors:  Lesley A Brown; Ryan J Sleik; Melody A Polych; William H Gage
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Age differences in verbal and visuo-spatial working memory updating: evidence from analysis of serial position curves.

Authors:  Felicia Fiore; Erika Borella; Irene C Mammarella; Rossana De Beni
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-12-02

3.  Does aging impair the capacity to use stored visuospatial information or online visual control to guide reach-to-grasp reactions evoked by unpredictable balance perturbation?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Sandra M McKay; Emily C King; Brian E Maki
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Placing the trailing foot closer to an obstacle reduces flexion of the hip, knee, and ankle to increase the risk of tripping.

Authors:  L S Chou; L F Draganich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture.

Authors:  B Kerr; S M Condon; L A McDonald
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The contribution of vision, proprioception, and efference copy in storing a neural representation for guiding trail leg trajectory over an obstacle.

Authors:  Kim Lajoie; Leigh W Bloomfield; Fraser J Nelson; Jaewon J Suh; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Hind limb stepping over obstacles in the horse guided by place-object memory.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Bogdan Gorny
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Characteristics of stepping over an obstacle in community dwelling older adults under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Lori A Schrodt; Vicki S Mercer; Carol A Giuliani; Marilyn Hartman
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Visuospatial tasks affect locomotor control more than nonspatial tasks in older people.

Authors:  Jasmine C Menant; Daina L Sturnieks; Matthew A D Brodie; Stuart T Smith; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Strategies for obstacle crossing in older adults with high and low risk of falling.

Authors:  Hui-Fen Pan; Horng-Chaung Hsu; Wei-Ning Chang; Jenn-Huei Renn; Hong-Wen Wu
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.