G B John Mancini1, Eunice Yeoh, David Abbott, Sammy Chan. 1. Cardiac Imaging Research Laboratory, Jack Bell Research Centre, Atherosclerosis Reversal Clinic, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. mancini@interchange.ubc.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction is an early finding in diverse vascular diseases and can be measured noninvasively using brachial ultrasound. There is great interest in the potential use of this parameter for assessing interventions or cardiovascular prognosis. Automated image analysis of the ultrasound images would facilitate implementation of such measurements in high throughput clinics and/or large clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To compare a new method designed to assess brachial artery diameter and percentage diameter changes through automated, beat-by-beat image processing (Brachial Tools, Medical Imaging Applications, USA), with a nonautomated method (Prosound System, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Brachial ultrasound tapes from 12 patients undergoing endothelial function assessment using forearm cuff-occlusion, measurement of flow-mediated dilation and responses to nitroglycerin were analyzed by both methods. RESULTS: The correlation between the two systems was excellent for both the measurement of absolute diameters (r=0.995, P<0.001) and percentage diameter changes (r=0.973, P<0.001). The automated method demonstrated no bias compared with the frame-by-frame method and excellent precision (0.07 mm and 1.62 percentage diameter change). CONCLUSIONS: The automated method provides valid data while substantially diminishing analysis time.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction is an early finding in diverse vascular diseases and can be measured noninvasively using brachial ultrasound. There is great interest in the potential use of this parameter for assessing interventions or cardiovascular prognosis. Automated image analysis of the ultrasound images would facilitate implementation of such measurements in high throughput clinics and/or large clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To compare a new method designed to assess brachial artery diameter and percentage diameter changes through automated, beat-by-beat image processing (Brachial Tools, Medical Imaging Applications, USA), with a nonautomated method (Prosound System, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Brachial ultrasound tapes from 12 patients undergoing endothelial function assessment using forearm cuff-occlusion, measurement of flow-mediated dilation and responses to nitroglycerin were analyzed by both methods. RESULTS: The correlation between the two systems was excellent for both the measurement of absolute diameters (r=0.995, P<0.001) and percentage diameter changes (r=0.973, P<0.001). The automated method demonstrated no bias compared with the frame-by-frame method and excellent precision (0.07 mm and 1.62 percentage diameter change). CONCLUSIONS: The automated method provides valid data while substantially diminishing analysis time.
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Mark A Black; Kyra E Pyke; Jaume Padilla; Greg Atkinson; Ryan A Harris; Beth Parker; Michael E Widlansky; Michael E Tschakovsky; Daniel J Green Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alon Peretz; Daniel F Leotta; Jeffrey H Sullivan; Carol A Trenga; Fiona N Sands; Mary R Aulet; Marla Paun; Edward A Gill; Joel D Kaufman Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2007-03-21 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Zainie Aboo Bakkar; Jonathan Fulford; Phillip E Gates; Sarah R Jackman; Andrew M Jones; Bert Bond; Joanna L Bowtell Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Alon Peretz; Jeffrey H Sullivan; Daniel F Leotta; Carol A Trenga; Fiona N Sands; Jason Allen; Chris Carlsten; Charles W Wilkinson; Edward A Gill; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 9.031