| Literature DB >> 20181144 |
Gurjit Nagra1, Mark E Wagshul, Shams Rashid, Jie Li, J Pat McAllister, Miles Johnston.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We recently reported a lymphatic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption deficit in a kaolin model of communicating hydrocephalus in rats with ventricular expansion correlating negatively with the magnitude of the impediment to lymphatic function. However, it is possible that CSF drainage was not significantly altered if absorption at other sites compensated for the lymphatic defect. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the lymphatic absorption deficit on global CSF absorption (CSF outflow resistance).Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20181144 PMCID: PMC2831828 DOI: 10.1186/1743-8454-7-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cerebrospinal Fluid Res ISSN: 1743-8454
Figure 1Example of hydrocephalus induced with administration of kaolin into the basal cisterns. Note the normal size of the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles in saline injected control animal (A) and the mild enlargement of the lateral ventricles in kaolin injected hydrocephalic animal (B). Scale = 1 mm per line.
Figure 2Ventricle size and lymphatic CSF uptake. (A) Mean ventricular volumes in the kaolin injected rats were significantly greater (*) than those in the saline injected animals (p < 0.0001; independent t-test). (B) The enrichment of radioactive protein tracer in the olfactory turbinates (lymphatic CSF uptake) was significantly less (*) in the animals receiving kaolin (p < 0.0001; independent t-test). The numbers of animals in each group are indicated below each histogram. The numbers within the brackets represent data taken from [16].
Figure 3Average CSF outflow resistance in intact, saline or kaolin-injected animals. Analysis by both the Kruskal Wallis (p < 0.0001) test and ANOVA (p < 0.0001) revealed that the 3 groups were significantly different. Post-hoc Bonferroni test indicated that the outflow resistance in the kaolin group was significantly greater than that of the saline (p = 0.004) and intact group (p < 0.0001) but no significant difference was observed between saline and intact animals.
Figure 4Relationship between CSF outflow resistance and ventricular volumes measured in the same rats (n = 16). These animals include kaolin and saline injected rats used in Figures 2A and 3. No volume measurements were made in intact animals. Please note that we measured CSF outflow resistance in 17 animals. However, the ventricular volume for one of these animals was not available. There was a significant positive correlation between CSF outflow resistance and ventricular volume (p = 0.001, Pearson correlation; r2 = 0.583).