Literature DB >> 11900304

Is subjective shortening in human memory unique to time representations?

J H Wearden1, A Parry, L Stamp.   

Abstract

Three experiments compared forgetting of the duration of a bar-like visual stimulus with forgetting of its length. The main aim of the experiments was to investigate whether subjective shortening (a decrease in the subjective magnitude of a stimulus as its retention interval increased) was observable in length judgements as well as in time judgements, where subjective shortening has been often observed previously. On all trials of the three experiments, humans received two briefly presented coloured bars, separated by a delay ranging from 1 to 10 s, and the bars could differ in length, duration of presentation, or both. In Experiment 1 two groups of subjects made either length or duration judgements, and subjective shortening-type forgetting functions were observed only for duration. Experiments 2 and 3 used the same general procedure, but the stimuli judged could differ both in length and duration within a trial, and different subject groups (Experiment 2) or the same subjects in two conditions (Experiment 3) made either length or duration judgements of stimuli, which were on average physically identical. Subjective shortening was only found with duration, and never with length, supporting the view that subjective shortening may be unique to time judgements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11900304     DOI: 10.1080/02724990143000108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  10 in total

1.  A common processing system for duration, order and spatial information: evidence from a time estimation task.

Authors:  Massimiliano Conson; Fausta Cinque; Anna Maria Barbarulo; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: evidence for selective interference effects.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Rattat; Delphine Picard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-03-04

4.  Illness perceptions and fatigue in systemic vasculitis.

Authors:  Peter C Grayson; Naomi A Amudala; Carol A Mcalear; Renée L Leduc; Denise Shereff; Rachel Richesson; Liana Fraenkel; Peter A Merkel
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Pigeons' memory for time: assessment of the role of subjective shortening in the duration-comparison procedure.

Authors:  Patrick Van Rooyen; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  The effect of predictability on subjective duration.

Authors:  Vani Pariyadath; David Eagleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neural oscillations associated with auditory duration maintenance in working memory.

Authors:  Xiaolin Yu; Youguo Chen; Junjie Qiu; Xiang Li; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Opposing Subjective Temporal Experiences in Response to Unpredictable and Predictable Fear-Relevant Stimuli.

Authors:  Qian Cui; Ke Zhao; Yu-Hsin Chen; Weiqi Zheng; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-21

9.  Verbal estimation of the magnitude of time, number, and length.

Authors:  R S Ogden; F R Simmons; J H Wearden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-12-17

10.  The effect of pain on reference memory for duration.

Authors:  Andrea Piovesan; Laura Mirams; Helen Poole; Ruth Ogden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.