Literature DB >> 21373945

Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: evidence for selective interference effects.

Anne-Claire Rattat1, Delphine Picard.   

Abstract

The present study sought to determine the format in which visual, auditory and auditory-visual durations ranging from 400 to 600 ms are encoded and maintained in short-term memory, using suppression conditions. Participants compared two stimulus durations separated by an interval of 8 s. During this time, they performed either an articulatory suppression task, a visuospatial tracking task or no specific task at all (control condition). The results showed that the articulatory suppression task decreased recognition performance for auditory durations but not for visual or bimodal ones, whereas the visuospatial task decreased recognition performance for visual durations but not for auditory or bimodal ones. These findings support the modality-specific account of short-term memory for durations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21373945     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0326-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  26 in total

1.  Intersensory comparisons of temporal judgments.

Authors:  S GOLDSTONE; W K BOARDMAN; W T LHAMON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-04

2.  When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?

Authors:  J H Wearden; N P M Todd; L A Jones
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.

Authors:  Sylvie Droit-Volet; Warren H Meck; Trevor B Penney
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Are memories for duration modality specific?

Authors:  Ruth S Ogden; John H Wearden; Luke A Jones
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Bidirectional interference between timing and concurrent memory processing in children.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Rattat
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2010-03-07

Review 6.  Cognitive components of picture naming.

Authors:  C J Johnson; A Paivio; J M Clark
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time.

Authors:  H Lejeune
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Time estimation: dependence and independence of modality-specific effects.

Authors:  D R Brown; L Hitchcock
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1965-12

9.  Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.

Authors:  W H Meck
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Short-term memory for time in children and adults: A behavioral study and a model.

Authors:  Sylvie Droit-Volet; John Wearden; Maria Delgado-Yonger
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2007-05-31
View more
  4 in total

1.  Temporal sequence discrimination within and across senses: do we really hear what we see?

Authors:  Daniel Bratzke; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Kamilla N Miller; Michael E Rudd; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23

3.  Mental Summation of Temporal Duration within and across Senses.

Authors:  Kohske Takahashi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neural oscillations associated with auditory duration maintenance in working memory.

Authors:  Xiaolin Yu; Youguo Chen; Junjie Qiu; Xiang Li; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.