OBJECTIVE: To compare illness perceptions among patients with different forms of vasculitis, identify risk factors for negative illness perceptions, and determine the association between illness perceptions and fatigue. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an online vasculitis registry to complete the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). The mean scores on each IPQ-R dimension were compared across different types of vasculitis. Cluster analysis and stepwise regression identified predictors of negative illness perception. Fatigue was measured using the general subscale of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20). Patient-reported measures of disease activity and IPQ-R dimensions were assessed in relation to MFI-20 scores using linear regression in sequential, additive models with model-fit comparisons. RESULTS: In total, 692 participants with 9 types of vasculitis completed the IPQ-R. For 6 of the 8 IPQ-R dimensions, there were no significant differences in mean scores between the different vasculitides. Scores in the identity and cyclical dimensions were significantly higher in Behçet’s disease compared with other types of vasculitis (13.5 versus 10.7 for identity and 4.0 versus 3.2 for cyclical [P < 0.05]). Younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]1.02–1.06), depression (OR 4.94, 95% CI 2.90–8.41), active disease status (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.27–3.29), and poor overall health (OR 3.92, 95% CI 0.88–17.56) were associated with negative illness perceptions. The sequential models demonstrated that the IPQ-R dimensions explained an equivalent proportion of variability in fatigue scores compared with measures of disease activity. CONCLUSION: Illness perceptions are similar across different types of vasculitis, and younger age is a risk factor for negative illness perceptions. Illness perceptions explain differences in fatigue scores beyond what can be explained by measures of disease activity.
OBJECTIVE: To compare illness perceptions among patients with different forms of vasculitis, identify risk factors for negative illness perceptions, and determine the association between illness perceptions and fatigue. METHODS:Participants were recruited from an online vasculitis registry to complete the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). The mean scores on each IPQ-R dimension were compared across different types of vasculitis. Cluster analysis and stepwise regression identified predictors of negative illness perception. Fatigue was measured using the general subscale of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20). Patient-reported measures of disease activity and IPQ-R dimensions were assessed in relation to MFI-20 scores using linear regression in sequential, additive models with model-fit comparisons. RESULTS: In total, 692 participants with 9 types of vasculitis completed the IPQ-R. For 6 of the 8 IPQ-R dimensions, there were no significant differences in mean scores between the different vasculitides. Scores in the identity and cyclical dimensions were significantly higher in Behçet’s disease compared with other types of vasculitis (13.5 versus 10.7 for identity and 4.0 versus 3.2 for cyclical [P < 0.05]). Younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]1.02–1.06), depression (OR 4.94, 95% CI 2.90–8.41), active disease status (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.27–3.29), and poor overall health (OR 3.92, 95% CI 0.88–17.56) were associated with negative illness perceptions. The sequential models demonstrated that the IPQ-R dimensions explained an equivalent proportion of variability in fatigue scores compared with measures of disease activity. CONCLUSION: Illness perceptions are similar across different types of vasculitis, and younger age is a risk factor for negative illness perceptions. Illness perceptions explain differences in fatigue scores beyond what can be explained by measures of disease activity.
Authors: Monique A M Gignac; Catherine L Backman; Aileen M Davis; Diane Lacaille; Xingshan Cao; Elizabeth M Badley Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Nicola Dalbeth; Keith J Petrie; Meaghan House; Jimmy Chong; Wingchi Leung; Rini Chegudi; Anne Horne; Greg Gamble; Fiona M McQueen; William J Taylor Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Neil Basu; Gareth T Jones; Nick Fluck; Alan G MacDonald; Dong Pang; Paula Dospinescu; David M Reid; Gary J Macfarlane Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2010-04-17 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Rula A Hajj-Ali; William S Wilke; Leonard H Calabrese; Gary S Hoffman; Xiaobo Liu; James Bena; Tiffany Clark; Carol A Langford Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Peter A Merkel; Karen Herlyn; Alfred D Mahr; Tuhina Neogi; Philip Seo; Michael Walsh; Maarten Boers; Raashid Luqmani Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Lillian Barra; Renée L Borchin; Cristina Burroughs; George C Casey; Carol A McAlear; Antoine G Sreih; Kalen Young; Peter A Merkel; Christian Pagnoux Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: Joanna C Robson; Nataliya Milman; Gunnar Tomasson; Jill Dawson; Peter F Cronholm; Katherine Kellom; Judy Shea; Susan Ashdown; Maarten Boers; Annelies Boonen; George C Casey; John T Farrar; Don Gebhart; Jeffrey Krischer; Georgia Lanier; Carol A McAlear; Jacqueline Peck; Antoine G Sreih; Peter S Tugwell; Raashid A Luqmani; Peter A Merkel Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Joseph Chilcot; Rona Moss-Morris; Micol Artom; Larissa Harden; Federica Picariello; Hector Hughes; Sarah Bates; Iain C Macdougall Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2016-06
Authors: Mollie N Schwartz; Casey A Rimland; Kaitlin A Quinn; Marcela A Ferrada; K Bates Gribbons; Joel S Rosenblum; Wendy Goodspeed; Elaine Novakovich; Peter C Grayson Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Abdulhameed A Alharbi; Yazeed A Alharbi; Ahmed S Alsobhi; Mohammad A Alharbi; Mariam A Alharbi; Adwaa A Aljohani; Alwaleed A Alharbi Journal: Cureus Date: 2021-06-17