Literature DB >> 10340538

Effect of filter vent blocking on carbon monoxide exposure from selected lower tar cigarette brands.

C T Sweeney1, L T Kozlowski, P Parsa.   

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to determine the effect of blocking filter vents on carbon monoxide (CO) exposure under ad lib smoking conditions. In Study 1, 12 daily cigarette smokers smoked cigarettes from the brands Now (1 mg tar by the FTC Method) and Marlboro Lights (10 mg tar) under each of two vent-blocking conditions (unblocked and finger blocked). Blocking filter vents with fingers led to an 85% increase in CO for the brand Now, but had no added effect on CO exposure from the Marlboro Lights. In Study 2, another 12 daily cigarette smokers smoked cigarettes from each of four additional brands: Carlton (1 mg tar), Now (2 mg tar), Virginia Slims Ultra-lights (5 mg tar), and Virginia Slims Lights (8 mg tar). Blocking filter vents with the lips caused all four brands to produce equal CO exposures. Blocking vents increased smokers' exposure to CO by 239% when smoking Carltons and by 44% when smoking Nows. No significant increases in CO with blocking were found for either of the Virginia Slims brands. These results suggest that the degree to which a brand is ventilated determines whether that brand is susceptible to increased CO yields as a result of vent blocking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10340538     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(98)00250-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  10 in total

1.  Beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs: an overview of early efforts and published research.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; J L Pillitteri
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Maximum yields might improve public health--if filter vents were banned: a lesson from the history of vented filters.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor; G A Giovino; C A Whetzel; J Pauly; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Smoking Behavior and Smoke Constituents from Cigarillos and Little Cigars.

Authors:  Bartosz Koszowski; Zachary R Rosenberry; Daniel Yi; Sean Stewart; Wallace B Pickworth
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2017-04

Review 5.  Cigarette Filter Ventilation and its Relationship to Increasing Rates of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Ae Song; Neal L Benowitz; Micah Berman; Theodore M Brasky; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Catalin Marian; Richard O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Casper Woroszylo; Peter G Shields
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The unbearable lightness of "light" cigarettes: a comparison of smoke yields in six varieties of Canadian "light" cigarettes.

Authors:  Paul L Gendreau; Frank Vitaro
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun

Review 7.  Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies.

Authors:  Catalin Marian; Richard J O'Connor; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Vaughan W Rees; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Behavioral filter vent blocking on the first cigarette of the day predicts which smokers of light cigarettes will increase smoke exposure from blocked vents.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Kathy Z Tang; Paul M Sanborn; Jon Y Zhou; Lynn T Kozlowski
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Cigarette Design Feature Influence on ISO TNCO Yields.

Authors:  Kimberly A Agnew-Heard; Vicki A Lancaster; Roberto Bravo; Clifford Watson; Matthew J Walters; Matthew R Holman
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 10.  Tobacco harm reduction: Past history, current controversies and a proposed approach for the future.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Dana M Carroll
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.018

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.