Literature DB >> 11889505

Comparison of brain activity during different types of proprioceptive inputs: a positron emission tomography study.

Sasa Radovanovic1, Alexander Korotkov, Milos Ljubisavljevic, Eugene Lyskov, Johan Thunberg, Galina Kataeva, Sergey Danko, Marina Roudas, Sergey Pakhomov, Sviatoslav Medvedev, Håkan Johansson.   

Abstract

It has been shown that the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, as well as the supplementary motor area (SMA), are involved in central processing of proprioceptive signals during passive and active arm movements. However, it is not clear whether different cortical areas are involved in processing of different proprioceptive inputs (skin, joint, muscle receptors), what their relative contributions might be, where kinesthetic sensations are formed within the CNS, and how they interact when the full peripheral proprioceptive machinery acts. In this study we investigated the representation of the brain structures involved in the perception of passive limb movement and illusory movement generated by muscle tendon vibration. Changes in cortical activity as indicated by changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were measured using positron emission tomography (PET). Twelve subjects were studied under four conditions: (1) passive flexion-extension movement (PM) of the left forearm; (2) induced illusions of movements (VI) similar to the real PM, induced by alternating vibration of biceps and triceps tendons (70-80 Hz) at the elbow; (3) alternating vibration of biceps and triceps tendons (with 20-50 Hz) without induced kinesthetic illusions (VN); and (4) rest condition (RE). The results show different patterns of cortex activation. In general, the activation during passive movement was higher in comparison with both kinds of vibration, and activation during vibrations with induced illusions of movement was more prominent than during vibrations without induced illusions. When the PM condition was contrasted with the other conditions we found the following areas of activation -- the primary motor (MI) and somatosensory area (SI), the SMA and the supplementary somatosensory area (SSA). In conditions where passive movements and illusory movements were contrasted with rest, some temporal areas, namely primary and associative auditory cortex, were activated, as well as secondary somatosensory cortex (SII). Our data show that different proprioceptive inputs, which induce sensation of movement, are associated with differently located activation patterns in the SI/MI and SMA areas of the cortex. In general, the comparison of activation intensities under different functional conditions indicates the involvement of SII in stimulus perception generation and of the SI/MI and SMA areas in the processing of proprioceptive input. Activation of the primary and secondary auditory cortex might reflect the interaction between somatosensory and auditory systems in movement sense generation. SSA might also be involved in movement sense generation and/or maintenance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11889505     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0994-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; John C Rothwell; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Frequency-dependent effects of muscle tendon vibration on corticospinal excitability: a TMS study.

Authors:  M Steyvers; O Levin; S M Verschueren; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  High-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area reduces bimanual coupling during anti-phase but not in-phase movements.

Authors:  Maarten Steyvers; Seiji Etoh; Dieter Sauner; Oron Levin; Hartwig R Siebner; Stephan P Swinnen; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion.

Authors:  P J Cordo; V S Gurfinkel; S Brumagne; C Flores-Vieira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Countering postural posteffects following prolonged exposure to whole-body vibration: a sensorimotor treatment.

Authors:  Olivier Oullier; Anne Kavounoudias; Cyril Duclos; Frédéric Albert; Jean-Pierre Roll; Régine Roll
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Mechanical flutter stimulation induces a lasting response in the sensorimotor cortex as revealed with BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Monica Christova; Stefan Golaszewski; Anja Ischebeck; Alexander Kunz; Dietmar Rafolt; Raffaele Nardone; Eugen Gallasch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Novel magnetomechanical MR compatible vibrational device for producing kinesthetic illusion during fMRI.

Authors:  Sarah J Carr; Kristin Borreggine; Jeremiah Heilman; Mark Griswold; Benjamin L Walter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Assessing proprioceptive function: evaluating joint position matching methods against psychophysical thresholds.

Authors:  Naveen Elangovan; Amanda Herrmann; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-11-21

9.  Does bracing influence brain activity during knee movement: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Youri Thijs; Guy Vingerhoets; Els Pattyn; Lies Rombaut; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Brief Report: Reduced Temporal-Central EEG Alpha Coherence During Joint Attention Perception in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Mark Jaime; Camilla M McMahon; Bridget C Davidson; Lisa C Newell; Peter C Mundy; Heather A Henderson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.